Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You can get around these silly HR rules, but it is not easy.
Basiclly you cannot work in the same role for whatever limit they have put on it. But you can move roles in the organisation and then the clock starts again.
Also you can challenge them by paying solictors like QDos or someone to prove this is all nonsene and they may back down.
I think you will have a better chance if just move roles within the company. Have a word with the line manager and change yourself from Developer to Production Engineer or sommit like that.
BTW: Isn't Blackrock more of a software house than an enterprise? These types usually do not worry about such contracting limits
a) Paranoid about HMRC coming after them despite all the structures (a fear that HMRC will target the deepest pockets).
b) Jealous permie's seeing all that unbroken income with no bench time.
c) HR/finance stating that if someone is there for x years, they should be paid permie rates, not contract.
d) Compliance with some financial regulations about external suppliers
e) All of the above
At a high level in a company, it does seem silly to be hiring the same guy for several years as a contractor. One of the reasons companies like contractors is that they can quickly be put in place when new work needs a sudden increase in people, and then just as quickly dropped when that passes.
If it becomes clear a role isn't transitory, then the company is best off getting a permie unless there's some specific reason otherwise.
Comment