Originally posted by Drewster
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contract Renew
Collapse
X
-
My English skills are not the best. Thanks for the mocking. I will crawl away with my tail between my legs. -
Ohhhhh Now I feel BadOriginally posted by dx4100 View PostMy English skills are not the best. Thanks for the mocking. I will crawl away with my tail between my legs.Comment
-
How about:Originally posted by Drewster View PostA1) should - by what criteria do you want me to judge "should"?
If you know a reason why he should, then reply "yes, you should".
If you know that he should not, say "no, you should not".
If you know that it doesn't matter, say "it doesn't matter".
If you don't know, say "I don't know", or don't say anything.
<sark>Does that cover it?</sark>Comment
-
You know the old joke about an "IT Answer".... ie It is 100% acurate but of no use to anyone...Originally posted by expat View PostHow about:
If you know a reason why he should, then reply "yes, you should".
If you know that he should not, say "no, you should not".
If you know that it doesn't matter, say "it doesn't matter".
If you don't know, say "I don't know", or don't say anything.
<sark>Does that cover it?</sark>
I think that any one of your suggestions (or indeed any combination) would constitute an example of an "IT Answer"
Whereas my answer was:
a) Witty
b) Clever
c) Helpful
Or am I deluded?


Does that cover it? - Is I assume a rhetorical question so " "

Comment
-
Wow what a lot of fuss. I thought your first post was clear enough.
If you've got a new Master Agreement, you probably want to start numbering the new schedules to it from 1 again. Then, referencing the Master Agreement number on each new schedule should make it nice and clear.
it doesn't make much difference though...Comment
-
They missed one.Originally posted by dx4100 View Post,,, Get my drift ? Even though from another prospective its actually my second load of work for them.
Sorry for asking such a simple question...
...
perspective
Many contract issues come down to the wording. If you can't handle simple English, then hire a contract expert to handle your difficulties.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
You can use anything you bloody want as a reference number.
So if I ever work for Huxley my invoices will state:
Our Ref: Hoaxley001
etc.
HTHComment
-
As long as you have a reference number. I got pulled up on one of my many HMRC investigations for not having reference numbers on my invoices!Originally posted by Ardesco View PostYou can use anything you bloody want as a reference number.
So if I ever work for Huxley my invoices will state:
Our Ref: Hoaxley001
etc.
HTH
Surely a date is enough of a reference.....Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment