My client requires that I meet the terms & conditions I am contractually obligated to carry out. I’m fine with this.
Recently I identified a solution that would allow my client to save a large amount of time producing results plus increasing their customer’s confidence, through using software I own as opposed to working with spreadsheets.
My client naturally wants to take the easy route and are happy for me to do this but I’ve said not without compensation, as there is nothing in my contract about using my licensed software, which has cost me well into five figured sums.
They don’t like this.
They believe I’m being already compensated through my daily rate, but this is really not the case as I am fully meeting the requirements as defined in my contract through my daily rate already. I’m not obligated to provided further, in my opinion.
Was I right to say no?
Recently I identified a solution that would allow my client to save a large amount of time producing results plus increasing their customer’s confidence, through using software I own as opposed to working with spreadsheets.
My client naturally wants to take the easy route and are happy for me to do this but I’ve said not without compensation, as there is nothing in my contract about using my licensed software, which has cost me well into five figured sums.
They don’t like this.
They believe I’m being already compensated through my daily rate, but this is really not the case as I am fully meeting the requirements as defined in my contract through my daily rate already. I’m not obligated to provided further, in my opinion.
Was I right to say no?

Comment