• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Direct contract wording help

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Direct contract wording help

    This will be the first time I've worked directly for a client so like the good little noob I am, I've taken the contract from the PCG.

    The wording in the schedule is particularly vague. Is it necessary to include all of the bullet points they specify? - the notes are particularly unhelpful in this one.

    I'm providing analyst & developer services on a particular project, would it be ok to define the service thus?

    2. Services
    2.1 Software Consultancy Services for the [] project, to include:
    2.1.1 Gathering & collating business requirements
    2.1.2 Analysis
    2.1.3 Design & Specification
    2.1.4 Development of software code
    2.1.5 Documentation
    2.1.6 Implementation and functional system testing
    2.1.7 Problem investigation and resolution
    2.1.8 Support during initial deployment
    2.2 Deliverables are expected to include:
    2.2.1 Supporting Documentation for all work supplied to the project
    2.2.2 New versions of software incorporating additional functionality
    2.3 The Client is expected to provide the Consultancy with sufficient access to the Client systems to enable the Services to be performed.
    2.4 The Consultancy is responsible for providing its own reference materials, administrative support, and equipment for use when Services are provided other than where use of the Client’s equipment is required for reasons of security, is particularly specialised, or where the Client’s equipment is itself the object of the Services.
    2.5 The Consultancy will liaise as necessary with [name of contact].
    2.6 The Consultancy shall be responsible for correcting any defective Services at its own cost, provided that such works are notified to the Consultancy by the Client one month after the Services are otherwise complete.
    2.7 Any further specific details, prioritisation, and time estimates for each piece of work will be as agreed between the Consultancy and the Client from time to time. Progress reports will be provided as and when reasonably required.

    I've left out details of

    Acceptance criteria
    Dependencies

    Basically, hold my hand....
    ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

    #2
    Ermm... no doubt a stupid question why not ask the PCG. Phone the office, use the fora, phone the legal helpline. Seems pretty pointless paying for an expert service and not using it.

    FWIW, the bullet points are there for a reason - to prompt you for what's potentially required. The Schedule describes the work to be done, so you'll have to modify it to suit. That might mean you delete the bits that don't apply, or add bits that do...
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by malvolio View Post
      Ermm... no doubt a stupid question why not ask the PCG. Phone the office, use the fora, phone the legal helpline. Seems pretty pointless paying for an expert service and not using it.
      The fora make me want to commit hard to navigate, and a pita to read.

      I hadn't considered phoning. Perhaps I will.

      Originally posted by malvolio View Post
      FWIW, the bullet points are there for a reason - to prompt you for what's potentially required. The Schedule describes the work to be done, so you'll have to modify it to suit. That might mean you delete the bits that don't apply, or add bits that do...
      Ermm... Thanks.
      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
        The fora make me want to commit hard to navigate, and a pita to read.

        I hadn't considered phoning. Perhaps I will.



        Ermm... Thanks.
        Go to "Legal and Accounting". Start a new post. Wait for authoritative answers, since it's been asked before. How hard is that?

        No comment - they are actually there to help, after all.

        Not at all...
        Blog? What blog...?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          Go to "Legal and Accounting". Start a new post. Wait for authoritative answers, since it's been asked before. How hard is that?
          With the crappy software they use for the forums, more work than it should be. Perhaps you could encourage them to use vBulletin?
          ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

          Comment

          Working...
          X