Originally posted by ASB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Talent Resource Management
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation! -
Originally posted by Lon_CTR View PostThis means that you are decalring it and paying the tax. Quite different from TRM whereby it is not declared and therefore falls in the realm of 'avoidance' or 'evasion'.
My guess is that the only reason you would need to declare a loan is if it is a taxable benefit, which I assume is because there is no interest being charged on it.
EDIT - FYI Just read this http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...a-company.html seems these loan things are everywhere!Last edited by Lewis; 15 August 2008, 12:47.Comment
-
Thinly veiled disguise
Originally posted by Lewis View PostEDIT - FYI Just read this http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...a-company.html seems these loan things are everywhere!
Mmm, from How Bromley Support Services works in that post:
"You wouldn't need to bother about offsetting your expenses as most of your salary is tax free to start with."and"The other advantage with Bromley Support Services is that we sort out all your tax and NI for you up front"
Now, let's compare that with the Batchworth/TRM text:
"You wouldn't need to bother about expenses because a huge bulk of your money is tax free to start with!!"and"The other advantage with Payscheme Plus is that we sort out your tax and NI for you up front"
Oh... actually, http://forums.contractoruk.com/464893-post5.html has already spotted this and compared addresses.
So, it's not so much that these schemes are everywhere, it is TRM that's everywhere.Comment
-
Originally posted by Lewis View PostThere is no need to declare a loan as long as it is a proper loan and you are paying interest. I would say it is not either avoidance or evasion. Who declares their mortgage on their tax return? Nobody.
My guess is that the only reason you would need to declare a loan is if it is a taxable benefit, which I assume is because there is no interest being charged on it.
EDIT - FYI Just read this http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...a-company.html seems these loan things are everywhere!
Not disclosing usage of a scheme incurs a modest penalty. Not registering it a big one. Users may need to register a scheme if it is provided by somebody offshore.
I think you may well be right that the "loan" doesn't need to be declared. My belief was that all payments received under a scheme were supposed to be declared on an individuals SA form - but I can't find any confirmation of this.
It seems that all users must therefore have filled in an SA form to at least declare their usage of the scheme. If it has been registered by the promoters then this is probably good enough.Comment
-
Please remain calm
Well it seems everyone is looking at what would happen if the loan is recalled. The fact is the Trust has to act in the interest of the members. Sooo i would think it would be easy to defend in court that its not in your interest to pay back right now. If it was recalled it goes back into the trust. The only way to get it out is to be a member.
The letter they sent seems to muddy the issue for people like us who are not accountants or lawyers. I would recommend to sit tight and wait for them to get back to us.
I'm really not worried about the HMRC. Tax avoidence is legal and almost NEVER retrospective. Any decent lawyer could fight it.
As for forgiving the loans.... If you forgive the loans while your an employee then you are liable for tax. If you nolonger work for the company then you can have it written off and there will not be any tax.
I'm going to wait till they get back to me and not panic. And no i don't work for them.Comment
-
Originally posted by Monkey Trousers View Post
Oh... actually, http://forums.contractoruk.com/464893-post5.html has already spotted this and compared addresses.
So, it's not so much that these schemes are everywhere, it is TRM that's everywhere.
Has anyone asked Mr Moss to forgive their loans? I think that will be the real test of whether TRM is honest.
Personally, I can't see how things have drastically changed since the Redding letter: TRM used to handle the PAYE and loans and now only handle the PAYE with Redding managing the loans.
Sure, TRM is a risky venture but contracting as a whole is not for the faint-hearted.
Also, I must apologise for my low post count. Please feel free to ignore anything above until I make a few hundred gratuitous comments elsewhere and start a few vaguely-interesting threads themed around money, opportunity and the bizarre ending of Guy Ritchie's Revolver.Comment
-
I'll spell it out.
Is the scheme registered?
Did you declare the scheme on your tax returns?
If not, then it seems to me that one route of attack by HMRC would be to seek to show that the loans are not real loans, that you knew they weren't, and that would seem to indicate evasion.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
So the company you "work for" (although you never really do), "loans" you a large amount money and says you never need to repay it.
Seems strange. Almost to good to be true. Actual tax paid 5% or so, some civic minded folks would be ashamed. I don't like to over pay to keep the country running...but this seems a bit extreme.Comment
-
I have just left TRM after being with them for a little over a year. What do you know about the Revenue investigation?Comment
-
Originally posted by Lon_CTR View PostThis means that you are decalring it and paying the tax. Quite different from TRM whereby it is not declared and therefore falls in the realm of 'avoidance' or 'evasion'.
Out of interest how much tax do you pay? corporate tax or NI&Income tax? because it would sound pretty unfeasible from a financial point of view as you would end up paying income tax on your whole salary ???Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment