Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I've done one gig via Hays IT. Working as my own ltd co. they had a standard form called I think a HIT20 put together by their lawyers and mine was IR35 compliant. They don't negotiate the content of a HIT20 due to 'legal costs' but they were prepared to negotiate my terms for overtime, etc. They are also the only EB that paid me within 4 working days of me faxing my timesheet and invoice - that's the fastest ever I've been paid.
Hi I've got a new gig that I got direct but the client wants me to go through there onsite agent which is Hays, is HIT20 still about ? I'm due to see the Hays guy tomorrow so I want to ask about it etc
Hi I've got a new gig that I got direct but the client wants me to go through there onsite agent which is Hays, is HIT20 still about ? I'm due to see the Hays guy tomorrow so I want to ask about it etc
I haven't seen the HIT20 contract for a little while actually. Other versions are very similar though - look out for the dodgy substitution clause in 3.5 (replacement can be rejected in client's 'sole discretion').
I haven't seen the HIT20 contract for a little while actually. Other versions are very similar though - look out for the dodgy substitution clause in 3.5 (replacement can be rejected in client's 'sole discretion').
I've just seen the contract and indeed it includes clause 3.5 and states 'The client and the employment busiverse reserve the right to refuse and proposed subsititution at there sole discretion'. Is that a no go-er then, should I get this reworded and get them to drop that statement ?
Comment