Originally posted by ladymuck
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IR35 Indemnity
Collapse
X
-
Yes, I agree. I have only rarely dropped an application for a role because of the agency being stupid but have always emailed the hiring manager to apologise for the agency preventing me from joining the team just in case there is something to be gained from it. Never had a response, so I guess not!Blog? What blog...?
-
Quick update.
Took the role, the idea of running two clients at once (this wasn't hidden from the agency) plus a positive IR35 QDOS contract review, swung it for me.
Agent reiterated many times the role was outside IR35.
Started last week, spent the first couple of days remotely filling in forms, 'onboarding' etc. followed by a site visit later in the week.- First 'oddness'; during 'Onboarding' being offered 'home working equipment' if I needed - monitors, keyboards etc. I mentioned I was a contractor and I'd buy anything I needed myself.....they repeated that I was welcome 'to order anything I needed' from their 'stores'
- Next 'oddness'; being 'invited' to daily, morning, team meetings with an expectation of attendance.....hmmmm....but I'm not a member of your 'team'.....and I can work whatever hours I like (according to my contract) and I really don't do mornings.....
- Followed by; 'we're in the office twice a week at least'...with an expectation so would I.....hmmmm.. that's a bit different to 'occasional site visits' and the contractual 'Work from anywhere you want'
- And then the biggie! 'Here's your corporate branded polo shirt'....Me:
I'd rather not thank you.....P.M. 'But you must!'
Well, that was a nice few days of running two clients at once. Back to just the one now
On a positive note, I'll get paid for the 3 days I invoiced with no issue (no £££ in the bank yet, but recieved the invoice approval today).Comment
-
Did you get an SDS from the client/agent?
This is the kind of situation that shows self filling in IR35 questions is pointless.Last edited by northernladuk; 1 September 2021, 21:39.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
About that bridge...Originally posted by David71 View PostAgent reiterated many times the role was outside IR35
Comment
-
Yep; SDS supplied. Working practices etc. all as expected for an Outside contract.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostDid you get an SDS from the client/agent?
This is the kind of situation that shows self filling in IR35 questions is pointless.
Agent was livid with the client when we spoke, he nearly had a stroke when tallking about me being given a client branded polo shirt!
Thing that did annoy me, and I think the agent, is that this will make a great little gig for someone as long as it has the correct IR35 determination but because it wasn't, everyone's time has just been wasted.Comment
-
It sounds like whoever did the SDS was either an idiot or not connected to the people you were going to be working with so they had their expectations and the SDS filler-inner had theirs and never the twain shall meet.
What a shame for you, that would have been quite handy.Comment
-
You previously mentioned paystream doing the review, why did you use QDOS as they could only sanity check the contract, they wouldn't know the business processes (as you found out).Originally posted by David71 View PostQuick update.
Took the role, the idea of running two clients at once (this wasn't hidden from the agency) plus a positive IR35 QDOS contract review, swung it for me.
Agent reiterated many times the role was outside IR35.
Started last week, spent the first couple of days remotely filling in forms, 'onboarding' etc. followed by a site visit later in the week.- First 'oddness'; during 'Onboarding' being offered 'home working equipment' if I needed - monitors, keyboards etc. I mentioned I was a contractor and I'd buy anything I needed myself.....they repeated that I was welcome 'to order anything I needed' from their 'stores'
- Next 'oddness'; being 'invited' to daily, morning, team meetings with an expectation of attendance.....hmmmm....but I'm not a member of your 'team'.....and I can work whatever hours I like (according to my contract) and I really don't do mornings.....
- Followed by; 'we're in the office twice a week at least'...with an expectation so would I.....hmmmm.. that's a bit different to 'occasional site visits' and the contractual 'Work from anywhere you want'
- And then the biggie! 'Here's your corporate branded polo shirt'....Me:
I'd rather not thank you.....P.M. 'But you must!'
Well, that was a nice few days of running two clients at once. Back to just the one now
On a positive note, I'll get paid for the 3 days I invoiced with no issue (no £££ in the bank yet, but recieved the invoice approval today).
And post April 2021 the contract is really completely irrelevant.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Paystream do the review of working practices 4 weeks into the contract to ensure the actual working practices match the clients original SDS - if they don't then the contract would be switched to inside IR35.Originally posted by eek View Post
You previously mentioned paystream doing the review, why did you use QDOS as they could only sanity check the contract, they wouldn't know the business processes (as you found out).
And post April 2021 the contract is really completely irrelevant.Comment
-
I posted regarding something else on LinkedIn today where I pointed out that the reason why many companies have blanket bans on outside IR35 contracts is because management can't trust their staff not to be idiots.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt sounds like whoever did the SDS was either an idiot or not connected to the people you were going to be working with so they had their expectations and the SDS filler-inner had theirs and never the twain shall meet.
What a shame for you, that would have been quite handy.
This seems like a prime example where the client needs to implement a similar rule just to protect themselves.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Today 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Yesterday 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41

Comment