I've had a look on the forum and people's view are largely down to opinion, but from a legal perspective what would you reccomend:
An agency wants me to start working on a 4 week contract starting from tomorrow. They are unable to issue a contract for me to sign, because they are facing a backlog of contracts which are going through their internal compliance checks with IR35.
I've asked the Agency for a confirmation email that work is going to begin with the client (who don't seem to know I'm starting and havn't reached out to me, I'm guessing because there is no contract).They also can't provide me with a Plan B or a written provision to cover this situation.
Should I go through and just start tomorrow if a contract isn't issued to me by tonight?
Should I reach out to the end client and say that work would be starting tomorrow but nothing has been signed so they're aware?
Or should I push back and say I'd be more comortable with an issued contract before beginning? The dayrate is low AF but the team and project are nice enough.
An agency wants me to start working on a 4 week contract starting from tomorrow. They are unable to issue a contract for me to sign, because they are facing a backlog of contracts which are going through their internal compliance checks with IR35.
I've asked the Agency for a confirmation email that work is going to begin with the client (who don't seem to know I'm starting and havn't reached out to me, I'm guessing because there is no contract).They also can't provide me with a Plan B or a written provision to cover this situation.
Should I go through and just start tomorrow if a contract isn't issued to me by tonight?
Should I reach out to the end client and say that work would be starting tomorrow but nothing has been signed so they're aware?
Or should I push back and say I'd be more comortable with an issued contract before beginning? The dayrate is low AF but the team and project are nice enough.
Comment