If Indian consultancies are thrown out they will simply be replaced by Eastern European suppliers. When I was in in Switzerland they gave up on their Indian supplier and switched to companies in Ukraine. The last company I worked for employed remote contractors via a company in Romania.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How can we fight back against Infosys, TCS and other Indian consultancies?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
In my last company when I started there were no offshore contractors, the company was under pressure and pushed my starting salary down, as the company expanded and started using offshore suppliers, our productivity went up, profitability went up, we got inflation busting pay rises, and it got a lot less stressful as we had plenty Programmers to get the work done. The customers were happy because we'd improved the platform and turnover went up. Because you use offshore suppliers, it means your onshore Software developers can be paid more.
If a company is paying cr*p wages it is because it is a cr*p company, not because it has offshored its resource.I'm alright JackComment
-
Yeah, course, that's right, that really happened.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIn my last company when I started there were no offshore contractors, the company was under pressure and pushed my starting salary down, as the company expanded and started using offshore suppliers, our productivity went up, profitability went up, we got inflation busting pay rises, and it got a lot less stressful as we had plenty Programmers to get the work done. The customers were happy because we'd improved the platform and turnover went up. Because you use offshore suppliers, it means your onshore Software developers can be paid more.
If a company is paying cr*p wages it is because it is a cr*p company, not because it has offshored its resource.
Comment
-
They also extended our holidays and introduced free snacks and a canteen.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostYeah, course, that's right, that really happened.

Obviously this isn't happening in Britain because the UK is erecting barriers to trade. Most people in Britain can at best expect stagnant wages and a declining standard of living. Stopping offshoring will simply accelerate this process.I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThey also extended our holidays and introduced free snacks and a canteen.
Obviously this isn't happening in Britain because the UK is erecting barriers to trade. Most people in Britain can at best expect stagnant wages and a declining standard of living. Stopping offshoring will simply accelerate this process.
Comment
-
I've changed companies, they made us all redundant so we got a massive pay off thx to the profitability of previous years and better paid jobs down the road as offshoring has led to a huge demand for highly paid on-shored qualified staff.Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
I'm alright JackComment
-
Have look how the share price of Infosys jumped on around the time when Financial Bill was being passed and Chancellor personally pleaded to MPs to push it. Totally there is no conflict of interest. Not at all.Comment
-
why would be plead to anyone? They have an 80 seat majority. what else could any MP have done?Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostHave look how the share price of Infosys jumped on around the time when Financial Bill was being passed and Chancellor personally pleaded to MPs to push it. Totally there is no conflict of interest. Not at all.Comment
-
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostHave look how the share price of Infosys jumped on around the time when Financial Bill was being passed and Chancellor personally pleaded to MPs to push it. Totally there is no conflict of interest. Not at all.
Comment
-
It's here: Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak personally intervened to stop private sector IR35 reform amendmentsOriginally posted by AnthonyQuinn View Postwhy would be plead to anyone? They have an 80 seat majority. what else could any MP have done?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment