Originally posted by cyborg1337
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This is not how you should interview a contractor!
Collapse
X
-
-
To be a successful contractor it helps to be an excellent problem solver and to be confident in your ability to solve those problems with limited information. This is just how it is due to the shorter duration. You don't have 6 months to on board and get trained.
Companies quite often don't know the answer to the questions you're asking, that's why they're bringing in a contractor. Quite often they don't even know what their real problem is or how to explain it. That's quite often part of the process. They just understand something isn't working or that they need to deliver something but they're not always sure what that is.
That's quite normal of a situation. If you're uncomfortable with that level of ambiguity than maybe it's not for you.
Previously there have been tons of permi positions set up as contract roles as a tax dodge that would work well for you. Unfortunately those are all going to disappear if they haven't already with new ir35 changes.
It sounds like this contract wouldn't have been good for you anyway because you appear to like everything in a neat little box and this company probably has a messy problem they want a contractor to clean up and that's just not what you do.
So it's good they didn't bring you on board and it's good for you you didn't get it because you probably wouldn't have excelled there. Nothing wrong with that.
But there is also nothing wrong with the company seeking out a contractor in their current situation. I don't think they did anything wrong, just wasn't a good match. That's why there is an interview.Last edited by jayn200; 11 June 2020, 15:32.Comment
-
The interview very rarely gives you any clue of what the gig will be like so making the interviewer squirm is not good. Best interview I ever had was 'I haven't got a clue if you are any good and can't ask you pertinent questions as I'm not a techie but we'll sack you asap if you don't know your stuff, can you start tomorrow ?'Comment
-
Originally posted by jayn200 View PostTo be a successful contractor it helps to be an excellent problem solver and to be confident in your ability to solve those problems with limited information. This is just how it is due to the shorter duration. You don't have 6 months to on board and get trained.
Companies quite often don't know the answer to the questions you're asking, that's why they're bringing in a contractor. Quite often they don't even know what their real problem is or how to explain it. That's quite often part of the process. They just understand something isn't working or that they need to deliver something but they're not always sure what that is.
That's quite normal of a situation. If you're uncomfortable with that level of ambiguity than maybe it's not for you.
Previously there have been tons of permi positions set up as contract roles as a tax dodge that would work well for you. Unfortunately those are all going to disappear if they haven't already with new ir35 changes.
It sounds like this contract wouldn't have been good for you anyway because you appear to like everything in a neat little box and this company probably has a messy problem they want a contractor to clean up and that's just now what you do.
So it's good they bring you on board and it's good for you you didn't get it because you probably wouldn't have excelled there. Nothing wrong with that.
But there is also nothing wrong with the company seeking out a contractor in their current situation. I don't think they did anything wrong, just wasn't a good match. That's why there is an interview.
You are very naive, if you think a single contractor can just come in and solve this particular mess. There is also a huge liabilty on the person doing this project because of a lack of ownership of the business requirements.
PS: I am successful contractor; Been in the industry for a while; Worked on some really challenging projects.Last edited by cyborg1337; 11 June 2020, 16:01.Comment
-
Originally posted by rootsnall View PostThe interview very rarely gives you any clue of what the gig will be like so making the interviewer squirm is not good. Best interview I ever had was 'I haven't got a clue if you are any good and can't ask you pertinent questions as I'm not a techie but we'll sack you asap if you don't know your stuff, can you start tomorrow ?'Last edited by cyborg1337; 11 June 2020, 15:24.Comment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostThe majority of my previous contracts have been struggling clients who have needed help. It's never been about me wanting things to be in neat little boxes; My contracts have been far from that; Migration projects in particular are far from that.
PS: I am successful contractpr; Been in the industry for a while; Worked on some really challenging projects.
Personally, I also don't hold the traditional viewpoint that interviews are 2 way. We are competing for work. I usually ask about the team and the problem but that's more just for the sake of being conversational and letting the interview flow a little better and also it's expected these days, I don't actually really care. You figure that all out on the first couple weeks and you can always leave anyway.
If an agent called me up tomorrow and said "I have a client that is willing to pay 600/day and needs someone to start monday, they think your profile is a good fit but i haven't seen a job spec and they don't have time to do an interview. Are you interested? Can you start Monday?"
I would say "Yes send me the contract, ill get it signed right away and be there Monday."
If I have multiple contract offers I assess them based off the day rate, starting date, hours worked, working location (home, close by, long commute), payment terms not based off whether i think the work is easy or not but again maybe that's just me. I am little unusual.Comment
-
Originally posted by jayn200 View PostIf an agent called me up tomorrow and said "I have a client that is willing to pay 600/day and needs someone to start monday, they think your profile is a good fit but i haven't seen a job spec and they don't have time to do an interview. Are you interested? Can you start Monday?"
I would say "Yes send me the contract, ill get it signed right away and be there Monday."
.
Also I did not really blow my interview. I asked a few competent questions; The questions stumped him, whereas in the case of a previous interview for a migration project it resulted in a very good conversation.
Finally, the interview process in general is really flawed. Making contractors do random coding challenges is also pointless. In this interview, if the person does not ask the right sort of questions and his expectations about the role are not clear, they're going to find themselves in a lot of trouble after and likely to leave with unfinished or poorly done work. Jayn200's quote from the previous post is a good example of this sort of unprofessionalism:
...I don't actually really care. You figure that all out on the first couple weeks and you can always leave anyway.Last edited by cyborg1337; 11 June 2020, 20:19.Comment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostThe majority of my previous contracts have been struggling clients who have needed help. It's never been about me wanting things to be in neat little boxes; My contracts have been far from that; Migration projects in particular are far from that.
You are very naive, if you think a single contractor can just come in and solve this particular mess. There is also a huge liabilty on the person doing this project because of a lack of ownership of the business requirements.
PS: I am successful contractor; Been in the industry for a while; Worked on some really challenging projects.Comment
-
Originally posted by perplexed View PostSo when you want to bring in subbies, are you funding them or are you expecting the client to?
More than happy to take a significant cut and fund a sub-contractor to ensure a project is delivered to a high standard (limited duration of course). Client satisifcation has always been important to me - I hate the idea of leaving my work unfinished or done to a poor standard.Comment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostSo would I in most cases, but this is not how this interview was conducted. And it became apparent that this project lacks ownership of the business requirements and because of the complex nature of the application (which also lacks the crucial testing coverage or documentation) you will inevitably miss requirements or make an error with the functionality at some point. The entire liability of this migration is on you. I've worked with consultancies, they would never ever make themselves entirely liable like this. But they also have the power to set things right from the begining (and this doesn't happen overnight). A single developer could deliberatly putting their neck on the line here; I'm surprised how naive people in this forum are.
Also I did not really blow my interview. I asked a few competent questions; The questions stumped him, whereas in the case of a previous interview for a migration project it resulted in a very good conversation.
Finally, the interview process in general is really flawed. Making contractors do random coding challenges is also pointless. In this interview, if the person does not ask the right sort of questions and his expectations about the role are not clear, they're going to find themselves in a lot of trouble after and likely to leave with unfinished or poorly done work. Jayn200's quote from the previous post is a good example of this sort of unprofessionalism:
For what it's worth I also primarily do erp data migrations and I've yet to walk into a contract that had good documentation. I have primarily worked on mid range erp projects though, doing a business central one right now migrating from a no name erp system that's running on a 30 year old version of an informix database.
At least 50% of my projects I am migrating from systems that don't have a data dictionary and I have to define and map the data myself. Quite often 90% of the people (sometimes everyone but me) involved in the project have never done a erp migration before.
It's fun, you just gotta to with the flow. Enjoy the ride.
I guess I am taking the tulip contracts no one else wants? Lol I would have probably gladly took the contract you interviewed for if I wasn't in contract right now.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Today 14:11
- How Autumn Budget 2024 affects homes, property and mortgages Today 09:23
- Autumn Budget 2024: Reeves raids contractor take-home pay Today 09:20
- Autumn Budget 2024: Umbrella companies hit, Employer NICs hiked, and BADR heading for 18% Yesterday 16:54
- Autumn Budget 2024: chancellor’s full speech Yesterday 16:34
- RecExpo got told this about Labour’s Employment Rights Bill… Yesterday 09:10
- A limited company just got one over HMRC on VAT; here’s how Oct 29 09:24
- Top 5 Autumn Budget areas for IT contractors to tick off Oct 28 09:30
- Top 5 umbrella company expenses things to still do in 2024 under 2016's T&S rules Oct 24 08:21
- PGMOL ties up Mutuality but Control’s new low bar is a concern set to run and run Oct 23 08:10
Comment