Originally posted by Viny
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Restriction clause in the contract
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 it's not a job. It's a B2B contract that you agreed to. Different rules apply.See You Next Tuesday
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 They were waiting on payment from client to come in before informing you of the breach encase your tried to get client to stop itOriginally posted by Viny View PostI had a call with the guy from agency and mentioned that issue , and asked if they have any other opportunity with other clients. But he mentioned the market is bad an they dont have any role available with them suitable for me.
 He didnt mentioned any other thing that time, as I was communicating them regarding my invoice and approval of time sheet for the past 2 months via my office email ( clients ) , I didnt hid the information from them. The account team from agency confirmed to me that I will get my payment of invoices on 24th april. But than from 27th april they started all this new thing of breach.
 
 When they are out of business with client ( as client would only deal with PSL) , I am not affecting any money loass/damage to them then why I should be deprived from getting a job and why should be penalised?
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 If you are 100% certain of this, then you have nothing to worry about.Originally posted by Viny View PostWhen they are out of business with client, I am not affecting any money loss/damage to them
 
 They might counter that you breached the contract with them that you signed, and that you could have continued working through them and into another agency on the PSL. They may also try to argue that it was because of your actions that they aren't on the PSL.
 
 It would be worth speaking to a solicitor who specialises in contract law (not an employment law). These guys do not come cheap, but they will be able to advise you. You'll need to provide them with the facts and make sure you get everything in writing from the agent and the client.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I understood now that they waited for the payment from the client ( I never asked client to stop the payment as I trusted the agency as I worked for more than 4 years for them. But at the end is it legal what they are doing?Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View PostThey were waiting on payment from client to come in before informing you of the breach encase your tried to get client to stop it
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
 
 Thanks,
 VinyComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Is it legal you breaching your contract?Originally posted by Viny View PostI understood now that they waited for the payment from the client ( I never asked client to stop the payment as I trusted the agency as I worked for more than 4 years for them. But at the end is it legal what they are doing?
 
 Thanks,
 Viny
 
 It might be. It might be, but only in your mind.
 
 And they will argue that.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 This is civil law not criminal law. Very different....Originally posted by Viny View PostI understood now that they waited for the payment from the client ( I never asked client to stop the payment as I trusted the agency as I worked for more than 4 years for them. But at the end is it legal what they are doing?
 
 Thanks,
 Viny
 The thing about civil law is it needs to be tested in court. So what they are doing is legal until someone rules that it isn't.
 
 The trick now, is to make it so that they realise they won't win in court if they sue you for damages.
 And that they realise they will lose in court if you sue them for non-payment.
 When that happens it is cheaper to pay you and drop the other case than to take it further....
 
 Unless they just pursue it out of sheer bloody mindedness.... This is why you don't get emotional. Don't be a dick or they might decide to waste a few hundred quid just screwing you around.
 
 One thing is for certain.... you're not getting this money in the short term. So plan on that and plug away at the other two items.See You Next TuesdayComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


 
				 
				 
				 
				
Comment