• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Will more jobs be outsourced to India after Rishi Sunak is the Chancellor?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
    Such complaint to House of Commons must be made by a member of public or an MP and person complaining must disclose their full name and address.

    I am guessing that nobody complained, because they are too afraid of being visited by men in suits.
    What other MP discloses their in-laws business that they have no direct interest in?
    See You Next Tuesday

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Lance View Post
      What other MP discloses their in-laws business that they have no direct interest in?
      It doesn't matter whether they have interest or not, it matters whether the public perceives they have interest.

      If you read the document I posted earlier, you would notice that some MPs do post what their in-law are up to even if that is not related to their job.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
        It doesn't matter whether they have interest or not, it matters whether the public perceives they have interest.

        If you read the document I posted earlier, you would notice that some MPs do post what their in-law are up to even if that is not related to their job.
        What other MP discloses their in-laws business that they have no direct interest in?


        this is like pulling teeth. What is it about my question that causes you not to answer?
        If you don't know then say so. If you do know then please answer.
        See You Next Tuesday

        Comment


          #74
          I understand it is too difficult to open the document and see for yourself.

          There you go:

          Mr Rees-Mogg’s wife and mother-in-law are both
          beneficiaries and trustees of a discretionary trust. Mr
          Rees-Mogg’s wife is a director and secretary of
          Saliston Ltd.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
            I understand it is too difficult to open the document and see for yourself.

            There you go:
            both of those are where his wife has an interest. That is why he is declaring it.
            See You Next Tuesday

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
              I understand it is too difficult to open the document and see for yourself.
              seeing as you'd already found them I didn't see the point in trawling myself. You're the one who wants to know why.
              I'm not doing the digging for you, just answering this question.
              Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
              Do we know why this is not listed here

              https://assets.publishing.service.go...rests_list.pdf

              Other MPs disclose what their in-laws are up to...
              An MP doesn't have to disclose something an in-law has an interest in.
              See You Next Tuesday

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Lance View Post
                seeing as you'd already found them I didn't see the point in trawling myself. You're the one who wants to know why.
                I'm not doing the digging for you, just answering this question.


                An MP doesn't have to disclose something an in-law has an interest in.

                The ministerial code states: "Ministers must provide a full list in writing of all interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. The list should also cover interests of the minister's spouse or partner and close family which might be thought to give rise to a conflict."

                Similar things occured in the past (apologies for the source):

                Minister failed to register brother-in-law's firm under his jurisdiction | Politics | The Guardian

                Minister would have to recluse him or herself from the areas where the may be a conflict:

                The justice minister, Jonathan Djanogly, has been stripped of his responsibility to regulate firms that "ambulance chase" the public following a Guardian investigation that revealed how he and his family could profit from controversial changes to legal aid he was piloting in parliament.

                (apologies for the source again) Justice minister stripped of powers | Politics | The Guardian

                Comment


                  #78
                  It’s quite vague though.

                  ‘Might be thought’ and ‘close family’ are not well defined.
                  Why not put that complaint in? There are no men in suits to come get you and maybe Rishi will get a slap on the wrists.
                  See You Next Tuesday

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Lance View Post
                    It’s quite vague though.

                    ‘Might be thought’ and ‘close family’ are not well defined.
                    Why not put that complaint in? There are no men in suits to come get you and maybe Rishi will get a slap on the wrists.
                    That's very reassuring.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Very intriguing is the fact that he only mentioned the word IR35 once.

                      Search for ir35 speaker:Rishi Sunak - TheyWorkForYou

                      Maybe he knows he needs to keep low profile when it comes to this and it was just a slip.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X