Originally posted by elsergiovolador
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Will more jobs be outsourced to India after Rishi Sunak is the Chancellor?
Collapse
X
-
See You Next Tuesday -
Originally posted by Lance View PostWhat other MP discloses their in-laws business that they have no direct interest in?
If you read the document I posted earlier, you would notice that some MPs do post what their in-law are up to even if that is not related to their job.Comment
-
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostIt doesn't matter whether they have interest or not, it matters whether the public perceives they have interest.
If you read the document I posted earlier, you would notice that some MPs do post what their in-law are up to even if that is not related to their job.
this is like pulling teeth. What is it about my question that causes you not to answer?
If you don't know then say so. If you do know then please answer.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
I understand it is too difficult to open the document and see for yourself.
There you go:
Mr Rees-Mogg’s wife and mother-in-law are both
beneficiaries and trustees of a discretionary trust. Mr
Rees-Mogg’s wife is a director and secretary of
Saliston Ltd.Comment
-
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostI understand it is too difficult to open the document and see for yourself.
There you go:See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostI understand it is too difficult to open the document and see for yourself.
I'm not doing the digging for you, just answering this question.
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostDo we know why this is not listed here
https://assets.publishing.service.go...rests_list.pdf
Other MPs disclose what their in-laws are up to...See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by Lance View Postseeing as you'd already found them I didn't see the point in trawling myself. You're the one who wants to know why.
I'm not doing the digging for you, just answering this question.
An MP doesn't have to disclose something an in-law has an interest in.
The ministerial code states: "Ministers must provide a full list in writing of all interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. The list should also cover interests of the minister's spouse or partner and close family which might be thought to give rise to a conflict."
Similar things occured in the past (apologies for the source):
Minister failed to register brother-in-law's firm under his jurisdiction | Politics | The Guardian
Minister would have to recluse him or herself from the areas where the may be a conflict:
The justice minister, Jonathan Djanogly, has been stripped of his responsibility to regulate firms that "ambulance chase" the public following a Guardian investigation that revealed how he and his family could profit from controversial changes to legal aid he was piloting in parliament.
(apologies for the source again) Justice minister stripped of powers | Politics | The GuardianComment
-
It’s quite vague though.
‘Might be thought’ and ‘close family’ are not well defined.
Why not put that complaint in? There are no men in suits to come get you and maybe Rishi will get a slap on the wrists.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostIt’s quite vague though.
‘Might be thought’ and ‘close family’ are not well defined.
Why not put that complaint in? There are no men in suits to come get you and maybe Rishi will get a slap on the wrists.Comment
-
Very intriguing is the fact that he only mentioned the word IR35 once.
Search for ir35 speaker:Rishi Sunak - TheyWorkForYou
Maybe he knows he needs to keep low profile when it comes to this and it was just a slip.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment