Originally posted by Spikeh
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Asking Agency for visibility of end-client contract?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Are you sure they take years? That may well be the case for large companies who have complex accounting/taxation affairs but it's certainly not the case for the individual or the one-man-band companies. -
Well no, of course I'm not. I've never experienced one and don't tend to read up on every case that's publicised. I'm sure that the length is fairly short for contractors who have only had a few clients (the majority?) but for someone like me - who's worked with over 100 clients over 20 years - an investigation would take much longer.Originally posted by billybiro View PostAre you sure they take years? That may well be the case for large companies who have complex accounting/taxation affairs but it's certainly not the case for the individual or the one-man-band companies.
Also, did you read your own links?
The tax investigations firm cautioned that while three months has become the average duration of a HMRC enquiry, many take much longer and can even stretch into years.Comment
-
That second link doesn't mention anything about small businesses and how long it takes to complete an investigation.Originally posted by billybiro View PostAre you sure they take years? That may well be the case for large companies who have complex accounting/taxation affairs but it's certainly not the case for the individual or the one-man-band companies.
The average is possibly correct - some HMRC investigations can be shut down very, very quickly (possibly even from the first response), whereas very few IR35 investigations will end after a couple of months.Comment
-
Can you provide a link to any tribunal where the IR35 status has hinged on whether there was a name on a contract?Originally posted by billybiro View PostDoes your personal name appear anywhere on the contract between YourCo and [other party] (other than as signatory for YourCo)?
If so, you're a disguised employee.
Can you provide a link to any tribunal where HMRC have one by proving that a lack of substitution on its own meant an IR35 win?Originally posted by billybiro View PostDo you have a genuine right of substitution (i.e. not one where the client can simply refuse a substitute for any reason they please)?
If not, you're a disguised employee.
TaComment
-
The fact you've had 100's of clients over the last 20 years isn't directly relevant as HMRC can and do investigate on a case-by-case, contract-by-contract basis. So you're as likely to be investigated and as potentially liable if you're a brand new contractor with your first client & contract or if you've been the in game for many years.Originally posted by Spikeh View PostWell no, of course I'm not. I've never experienced one and don't tend to read up on every case that's publicised. I'm sure that the length is fairly short for contractors who have only had a few clients (the majority?) but for someone like me - who's worked with over 100 clients over 20 years - an investigation would take much longer.
Also, did you read your own links?
Yes, I did read my own links. Obviously, there are outliers and each investigation is done on it's own merits but it's clearly fair to say that, on average, an investigation into a person/one-man-band Ltd. takes considerably less time than an investigation into a large corporate entity.Comment
-
Aren’t the ones that end in months ended when HMRC give it up as not worth pursuing?Originally posted by billybiro View PostAre you sure they take years? That may well be the case for large companies who have complex accounting/taxation affairs but it's certainly not the case for the individual or the one-man-band companies.
The ones they do pursue do take an awful long time as it’s complex.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Don't forget, an IR35 investigation could start with an innocent "we just want to check your VAT returns" and then it escalates into something very different.Comment
-
Not sure who's replies you're reading billy. I didn't say the number of clients I've had has anything to do with the likelihood of an investigation. In fact, my reply directly addresses your factoid about "case-by-case"; I have had many clients, therefore an investigation would take a lot longer than someone who is new to contracting, or who has had a smaller number of engagements.Originally posted by billybiro View PostThe fact you've had 100's of clients over the last 20 years isn't directly relevant as HMRC can and do investigate on a case-by-case, contract-by-contract basis. So you're as likely to be investigated and as potentially liable if you're a brand new contractor with your first client & contract or if you've been the in game for many years.
Yes, I did read my own links. Obviously, there are outliers and each investigation is done on it's own merits but it's clearly fair to say that, on average, an investigation into a person/one-man-band Ltd. takes considerably less time than an investigation into a large corporate entity.
You're going well off topic now, and preaching to a choir singing off the same hymn sheet - albeit a slightly more positive one.Comment
-
And that's usually the time you send them a nice letter on headed notepaper saying please contact IPSE as they deal with all matters IR35.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostDon't forget, an IR35 investigation could start with an innocent "we just want to check your VAT returns" and then it escalates into something very different.
And they know they are in for a fight should they want one.
This is what I pay my IPSE+ for.
qhHe had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
Comment
-
And they also know it may well be a fight worth having since the very fact you're hiding behind IPSE in response to what HMRC will see as merely a friendly inquiry means you've probably got something to hide.Originally posted by quackhandle View PostAnd that's usually the time you send them a nice letter on headed notepaper saying please contact IPSE as they deal with all matters IR35.
And they know they are in for a fight should they want one.
This is what I pay my IPSE+ for.
qhComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


Comment