Originally posted by ruasonid
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How to structure and run a new consultancy?
Collapse
X
-
It it was my spouse, going down well wouldn't be a problem at all.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
the only time I've seen anything like this work is when each person has very different skills.
EG. A techie, a salesman and a PM. The salesman will never do billable work and the other 2 have to accept that their work is paying for him.
As other have said, the reason it doesn't work and usually fails is over sharing of workload and cash.
You'd also need some very good legal documentation and seriously consider what each of you want to achieve long term. I imagine you've not thought much further ahead than the next 6 months when 6 years is the minimum sort of timeline for an agreed plan.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
It sounds like they're using it as a vehicle to enable the business that they've near enough secured (hence no salesman needed). Legal documentation is a must, but if the company is simply an entity through which they have to operate, then they don't need a salesperson - it's still a case of discussing the proposal with an accountant to establish what the simplest and/or best options are.Originally posted by Lance View Postthe only time I've seen anything like this work is when each person has very different skills.
EG. A techie, a salesman and a PM. The salesman will never do billable work and the other 2 have to accept that their work is paying for him.
As other have said, the reason it doesn't work and usually fails is over sharing of workload and cash.
You'd also need some very good legal documentation and seriously consider what each of you want to achieve long term. I imagine you've not thought much further ahead than the next 6 months when 6 years is the minimum sort of timeline for an agreed plan.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Businesses who rely on one client end up going bust.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostIt sounds like they're using it as a vehicle to enable the business that they've near enough secured (hence no salesman needed). Legal documentation is a must, but if the company is simply an entity through which they have to operate, then they don't need a salesperson - it's still a case of discussing the proposal with an accountant to establish what the simplest and/or best options are.
I learnt that temping in an import/export department just out of university."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Deja-vu all over again
I feel I've seen this question before
Always good to get a second opinionComment
-
Just use A B And C shares and declare dividends according to how much each of you bills the client, less some agreed amount to pay the accountant etc.
As long as you can charge at consultancy rates you'll have twice as much money anyway, so no point in bickering about the penniesComment
-
Riiiight.. So his current client that pay for them already are going to engage them on twice as much to carry on working for them with no business offering except to fill some more seats up with bums.... Right on.Originally posted by hugebrain View PostJust use A B And C shares and declare dividends according to how much each of you bills the client, less some agreed amount to pay the accountant etc.
As long as you can charge at consultancy rates you'll have twice as much money anyway, so no point in bickering about the pennies'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
I'd say that it's the other way around, the dev guys have to accept that without the sales guy they have no money coming in.Originally posted by Lance View Postthe only time I've seen anything like this work is when each person has very different skills.
EG. A techie, a salesman and a PM. The salesman will never do billable work and the other 2 have to accept that their work is paying for him.
As other have said, the reason it doesn't work and usually fails is over sharing of workload and cash.
You'd also need some very good legal documentation and seriously consider what each of you want to achieve long term. I imagine you've not thought much further ahead than the next 6 months when 6 years is the minimum sort of timeline for an agreed plan.Comment
-
Yep, the technical solution / people can be smarter than feck, but without any marketing, strategy and sales man you are going nowhere fast.Originally posted by Antman View PostI'd say that it's the other way around, the dev guys have to accept that without the sales guy they have no money coming in.
Lets just say I have an insight to what someone else is involved in and sometimes has my input too
I should add this is in the context of actually growing a business, not just getting a few BOS in a couple of places (got the T shirt for that one somewhere).Last edited by MrMarkyMark; 2 February 2017, 19:34.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
I've been to some entrepreneur networking groups. There are some brilliant IT ideas out there but you will never have heard of them as for some reason some people in IT don't understand the importance of marketing and sales.Originally posted by Antman View PostI'd say that it's the other way around, the dev guys have to accept that without the sales guy they have no money coming in."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment