Originally posted by Lance
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Interview, Job Confirmed, PSL issues
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Given the Director wants the OP, then it makes sense for the OP to be up front with the Director and say what day rate he was promised. If he was happy to take that through Agency A, stands to reason that it should be acceptable through Agency B.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Yes that is one difficult to read post! 
 
 Long and short of it is, if the client wants you badly enough then it's up to them to deal with the fallout with this agency, but if they really don't have an agreement in place to supply contractors then I don't see how the client could be in breach of it, and therefore no issue with you signing up via another agency.Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Looking at this logically:-
 
 If the Agency you went with is on the PSL for Permie, I doubt they would want to lose a business channel and would probably allow you to go via another agency.
 
 Also, if they are an unable to agree terms with the company then they would not have made any money off you, they couldn't agree. Therefore, you could argue you were free to go through another agency. This isn't the case that you were with them and you got nicked by another agency and cost them the commission for the duration of your contract.
 
 Lastly, get to the point, the amount of times you repeated yourself and made the post much longer than it needed to be was shocking!Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Why not see if you can go direct to the client and bin all the agencies.Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
 
 I preferred version 1!Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Sod all that. He can ditch Agency A because they cannot provide the service proposed and as such cannot demonstrate a loss from him switching agencies.Originally posted by ContractorHardman View PostLooking at this logically:-
 
 If the Agency you went with is on the PSL for Permie, I doubt they would want to lose a business channel and would probably allow you to go via another agency.
 
 Also, if they are an unable to agree terms with the company then they would not have made any money off you, they couldn't agree. Therefore, you could argue you were free to go through another agency. This isn't the case that you were with them and you got nicked by another agency and cost them the commission for the duration of your contract.
 
 Lastly, get to the point, the amount of times you repeated yourself and made the post much longer than it needed to be was shocking!The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 It depends if the director was stupid enough to agree to terms with agency A.Originally posted by BoredBloke View PostWhy not see if you can go direct to the client and bin all the agencies."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 That would be trumped by the corporate PSL.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIt depends if the director was stupid enough to agree to terms with agency A.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I was thinking about why he hasn't responded so far then realised he is probably still writing it. I expect to see a response in the next 2 days when he has finished typing it  Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Originally posted by ContractorHardman View PostI was thinking about why he hasn't responded so far then realised he is probably still writing it. I expect to see a response in the next 2 days when he has finished typing it  'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! 'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I read the OPs original mail and my eyes are now bleeding... but yes in short ditch A, go with B and tell A to FO if they get shirty EOM.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


 
				 
				 
				 
				
Comment