Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anyone know of a Contractor sued by an Agency or Client, ever?
Collapse
X
-
-
Nice edit on your first post to remove all the references to insurance being a rip off.
That was the point you were making, wasn't it?
...Admin, can we stop people from editing their first posts if it destroys the point of the thread?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
No, the point of the thread is the title. You singled out the comment about insurance and sidetracked it off about that.Originally posted by WTFH View PostNice edit on your first post to remove all the references to insurance being a rip off.
That was the point you were making, wasn't it?
...Admin, can we stop people from editing their first posts if it destroys the point of the thread?Last edited by mdw; 24 March 2016, 23:18.Comment
-
Originally posted by mdw View PostNo, the point of the thread is the title. You singled out the comment about insurance and sidetracked it off about that.
OK, your thread, your edits.
I know of contractors who have had high legal costs for the process of taking an agent to court in an effort to resolve non-payment at the end of a contract and the spreading of falsehoods. I know of agents who have threatened to counter-sue should the contractor's case be successful.
It's exactly the same in other businesses - e.g. when clients take building contractors to court for perceived failures in a construction project or when customers take suppliers to court over the quality of their product.
(I didn't mention insurance in there once, but if I did, I'd say that £300 a year is a small cost when legal fees quickly mount up to £10,000)…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
You said in your first post that insurance was a rip off which is why my entire first answer was that it wasn't.Originally posted by mdw View PostNo, the point of the thread is the title. You singled out the comment about insurance and sidetracked it off about that.
In future I'm going to quote your posts in full."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
If you tripped someone up in the lift of a shared building and they broke their leg so couldn't work for 3 months then you would be liable. Lots of banks and other companies in the UK ask for various types of insurance.Originally posted by mdw View PostIt was a greenfield payment system for a govt dept. They demanded it, but none of the banks I where worked on live internet banking development ever asked for it.
If anything went wrong anyway, it would really either be down to the testers, or manager who signed off on it."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Some gigs you won't get on site without insurance.
In any case, I would rather have it it often I have had to configure live systems...
Often fixing the attempts of the Perms
Last edited by MrMarkyMark; 25 March 2016, 01:17.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
I don't work in the finance sector, the implications of my actions are far less important than money - in my last client if I made a mistake in the production system it only meant someone's life might not last as long.
Never mind the end user, while I was there they had a warehouse user spend 6 weeks in hospital due to accidental exposure to cytotoxic drugs, thankfully not my fault, they were using the old system.
Currently in a business meeting discussing the radioactive half life of certain products and how the IT systems need to meet the demands.
The product is manufactured on the other side of the world based on the length of time to get it to the operating theatre in the hospital and the day and time of the operation.
If I design a bad solution, I'm responsible for it. The business may sign it off, but they are not responsible for the technical design.
If you're not responsible for your actions and you report to a "manager", then you're right - you probably don't need insurance. It sounds more like you are an employee.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
That's what to do.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostYou said in your first post that insurance was a rip off which is why my entire first answer was that it wasn't.
In future I'm going to quote your posts in full.
PS. Google casheing is your friend.
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
The thing being asked was the bit that ended with the '?' character.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostYou said in your first post that insurance was a rip off which is why my entire first answer was that it wasn't.
In future I'm going to quote your posts in full.
If I should post another question I'll remember to keep it really simple.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment