- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Notice given over Christmas
Collapse
X
-
-
And that HR have way too much power these days.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyPersonally I think this is indicative of a client with brain damage. Noting clever at all about this scenario. It never ceases to amaze me the way clients will pay contract rates and actively seek to not get full value from the contractor. So things like giving you a visitor pass, filling out multiple timesheets, bizarre contractor admin, not providing key information or resources.
Though I should be grateful. At my current gig I put my personal mobile on their system and HR made me remove it. And told me off for doing weekends without getting paid and for doing too long a professional day. So maybe they are not all bad....Comment
-
Don't forget it could also be the contractor was not good enough and it was worth any hit to replace them. After spending quite a bit of time helping with the resourcing process at my client this year I can't believe it doesn't happen more.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyCan't say I agree that this is clever?
1. Any work he was doing doesnt require a handover - Why would you pay double the contract rate for a contractor that produces work that really doesn't matter?
2. The work he was doing will require a hand over - You now have lost a significant amount of work that you paid a contractor at double the permie rate to do.
-- The true reason -- It will be about a budget or budget objective that was missed and the project was canned. - Waste of money all round.
Personally I think this is indicative of a client with brain damage. Noting clever at all about this scenario. It never ceases to amaze me the way clients will pay contract rates and actively seek to not get full value from the contractor. So things like giving you a visitor pass, filling out multiple timesheets, bizarre contractor admin, not providing key information or resources.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Yup. Sunken cost fallacy on behalf of the contractor is too often seen often combined with a false sense of value.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostDon't forget it could also be the contractor was not good enough and it was worth any hit to replace them. After spending quite a bit of time helping with the resourcing process at my client this year I can't believe it doesn't happen more.
Our accounting unit is 500K. Now where in the scheme of things does a contractor figure on my P&L? Not even a blip. Part of being a contractor is that you are expendable. If you are a tulip one, you go to the top of the list when the CFO squeezes.Last edited by clearedforlanding; 3 January 2016, 17:57.Comment
-
Permies are a lot more expensive than contractors.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy2. The work he was doing will require a hand over - You now have lost a significant amount of work that you paid a contractor at double the permie rate to do.
Personally I think this is indicative of a client with brain damage. Noting clever at all about this scenario. It never ceases to amaze me the way clients will pay contract rates and actively seek to not get full value from the contractor. So things like giving you a visitor pass, filling out multiple timesheets, bizarre contractor admin, not providing key information or resources.
Sometimes contractors are simply hired on "projects" with the sole aim that a budget isn't cut. When the budget is renewed the contractor has served his purpose....... preserving the managers budget.Last edited by clearedforlanding; 3 January 2016, 18:05.Comment
-
I gave in notice over this holiday period, I worked over holiday period, I got paid.
You no work, no pay.
Contract isn't an obligation to pay you when you don't work, but to pay you for the work you do. More work done more money.
Simples?!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08


Comment