For the first time in 15 years I've been pulled in for what would probably be called a disciplinary, if I were permie.
Been at this client for 6 weeks. It's a very, very agile environment. Everything I get given is in bite sized chunks with layers of administrative crap wrapped around it & everything I do seems to be scrutinised by a much broader range of people than places I've been before.
They don't have an issue with my code. It's more the way I fit into a team; no. 1 gripe is the amount I say at the morning stand up. True, I try to keep it as brief as possible because I got up at 5am & I don't enjoy talking guff in front of 20 people at the best of times, especially not when I feel like I'm under a microscope.
Then there's what they call general team work - I don't tackle problems together with other team members enough for their liking; even the fact that I don't make coffee for the team was flagged as an issue.
Seriously, I've never had any problems like this before but I've never worked anywhere so obsessed with team dynamics. Seems like you can't just pickup a piece of work & get on with it - they're not happy unless they see you interacting with someone or sitting down for a bit of pair programming.
So, this negative performance review, or whatever you want to call it, is this an "agile" way of bringing you round to their way of working or is it, err, the writing on the wall?
My own view? I just feel that my face doesn't fit. They're mainly young guys, recent grads, who are keen and hungry for it. I'm towards the other end of my career & while I can play the game I just can't fake the enthusiasm for something I find so dull, even if the rate is good; That said, I get the job done so I don't get what their issue is.
Been at this client for 6 weeks. It's a very, very agile environment. Everything I get given is in bite sized chunks with layers of administrative crap wrapped around it & everything I do seems to be scrutinised by a much broader range of people than places I've been before.
They don't have an issue with my code. It's more the way I fit into a team; no. 1 gripe is the amount I say at the morning stand up. True, I try to keep it as brief as possible because I got up at 5am & I don't enjoy talking guff in front of 20 people at the best of times, especially not when I feel like I'm under a microscope.
Then there's what they call general team work - I don't tackle problems together with other team members enough for their liking; even the fact that I don't make coffee for the team was flagged as an issue.
Seriously, I've never had any problems like this before but I've never worked anywhere so obsessed with team dynamics. Seems like you can't just pickup a piece of work & get on with it - they're not happy unless they see you interacting with someone or sitting down for a bit of pair programming.
So, this negative performance review, or whatever you want to call it, is this an "agile" way of bringing you round to their way of working or is it, err, the writing on the wall?
My own view? I just feel that my face doesn't fit. They're mainly young guys, recent grads, who are keen and hungry for it. I'm towards the other end of my career & while I can play the game I just can't fake the enthusiasm for something I find so dull, even if the rate is good; That said, I get the job done so I don't get what their issue is.
Comment