I know there have been several threads about this. I've had a look through them.
So I just wanted to ask for some specific opinions...
New gig, Arrows Group, monthly invoicing with payment at the end of the following month. I.e. between 8 and 4 weeks of credit/risk. Averaging at 6 weeks.
I thought my previous role was bad with 21 days on monthly invoices.
Anyway, while being less than ideal, do you guys think it's ridiculous enough to flat-out reject? Or is it fairly usual even if it could be better?
Not credit checked Arrows Group yet, but I'm assuming they're big enough to not worry. Only worry is the end client product isn't actually monetised - they are funded by a parent company.
No mention of opt-out yet, but expecting it to turn up with the contract (currently they've sent me some paperwork, but not the contract). Even though it may technically be unenforceable I don;t think it's been tested yet? Nor do I fancy putting it to the test myself.
So I just wanted to ask for some specific opinions...
New gig, Arrows Group, monthly invoicing with payment at the end of the following month. I.e. between 8 and 4 weeks of credit/risk. Averaging at 6 weeks.
I thought my previous role was bad with 21 days on monthly invoices.
Anyway, while being less than ideal, do you guys think it's ridiculous enough to flat-out reject? Or is it fairly usual even if it could be better?
Not credit checked Arrows Group yet, but I'm assuming they're big enough to not worry. Only worry is the end client product isn't actually monetised - they are funded by a parent company.
No mention of opt-out yet, but expecting it to turn up with the contract (currently they've sent me some paperwork, but not the contract). Even though it may technically be unenforceable I don;t think it's been tested yet? Nor do I fancy putting it to the test myself.
Comment