Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
'IPSE Friendly' contract failed by QDOS
Collapse
X
-
I know that... and explicitly said as much in one of my previous posts. As MS says though reading the clause as its supposedly written in the contract I very much doubt it...merely at clientco for the entertainment -
I was much happier with their substitution clause in 2004 than I would be with this one.Originally posted by eek View PostI know that... and explicitly said as much in one of my previous posts. As MS says though reading the clause as its supposedly written in the contract I very much doubt it...Comment
-
It wasn't.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostHowever, that doesn't mean that the contract clause posted wasn't reviewed by IPSE and approved as IR35-friendly.
HTHBlog? What blog...?
Comment
-
You're clearly party to knowledge that I'm not, so I'll bow to your statement, assuming that's an official IPSE one of course.Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt wasn't.
HTHComment
-
Of course it's not official. Read what was said on the IPSE forum in response to my earlier postOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYou're clearly party to knowledge that I'm not, so I'll bow to your statement, assuming that's an official IPSE one of course.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
We're clearly interpreting what has been said in the thread I started in different ways - I see nothing that clearly says that the clause wasn't reviewed by IPSE, whereas you obviously doOriginally posted by malvolio View PostOf course it's not official. Read what was said on the IPSE forum in response to my earlier post
Comment
-
I'm not arguing the point on here. But you're wrong.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWe're clearly interpreting what has been said in the thread I started in different ways - I see nothing that clearly says that the clause wasn't reviewed by IPSE, whereas you obviously do
Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
-
Still ongoing I'm afraidOriginally posted by UglyBetty View PostWas there a definitive answer on this? Did the agency make it up?Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
There isn't a definitive answer yet - without seeing the entire contract, no-one at IPSE can confirm or deny whether the contract presented by the agent to the OP matches the one reviewed by IPSE and passed.Originally posted by UglyBetty View PostWas there a definitive answer on this? Did the agency make it up?
If the OP is willing to share the contract in full, I have offered to take the matter up within IPSE for him - but without seeing the contract, IPSE won't be in a position to say whether it's an IPSE approved contract or not.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10
- Is Reporting Company Payments to Participators a concerning consultation for contractors? Apr 29 07:38
- Now it’s finally here, how is HMRC Joint & Several Liability risk being managed, and is payment control the holy grail? Apr 28 06:55
- How Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are hit by HMRC’s Joint & Several Liability Apr 27 06:08

Comment