• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IPSE vs QDOS

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    TLC35 gives you free IR35 reviews, IPSE doesn't offer that
    No, although they do offer a pretty comprehensive contract review service. And to be fair, QDOS's reviews aren't actually free either, since you have to buy a potentially unnecessary product (IMVHO, natch...) to get them.

    Also, of course, IPSE+ covers a hell of a lot more than IR35.
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #62
      So if I can sum things up correctly, the current thinking is (in terms of Hector visits, vat, tax and IR35 only)...

      IPSE = IPSE help on tax investigations,
      IPSE+ =IPSE help on tax investigations and compliance checks plus cash compensation for tax compliance meetings - but no cover for fines, back tax etc
      QDOS TL35 = Free contract reviews, IF (and only if) they are happy are you covered, but if found inside IR35 after review, they cover any tax fines/interest charges

      Qs...
      1) How many IR35 investigations have IPSE lost (if its none, then why does everybody not just use IPSE, so why is there a TL35 product at all)
      2) I read various arguments on other threads about QDOS never actually having paid out on TL35 - is this correct?
      3) There was also discussions about QDOS backing out of investigations or asking for more money (between 7.5k to 10k) but IPSE stepping in
      4) It would appear QDOS do IR35 contract reviews by IPSE do not - but then, as it seems from other discussions that Hector can ignore contracts and go to the client to ask for actual working practices (in terms of substitution (which has to have actually been invoked rather than just stated) and SDC), maybe the contract review is not so great after all?

      Is this correct? Anything I have missed?

      My own situation is that I have been a contractor/freelancer for 14 years - no involvement by Hector other than the usual tax code changes and the regular payment of PAYE, divi tax, corp tax, end of year filing etc. But I feel I am due for an audit at some point coming up. My work is 50% freelance (true product development/supply at fixed cost) and 50% contract. 70% of my contracts have been in the public sector (changing to private come Christmas if I can). I want to get some backup should Hector come sniffing, but dont want to pay over the top on things which wont be of any value to me. My own accountant has just started offering (flogging) tax investigation insurance at £115 a year which covers their costs for any investigation, but its all on FreeAgent so anybody could help in an investigation, but their offer got me thinking about some soft of cover to sleep a little better at night.
      Last edited by jaffab; 19 August 2016, 10:36.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by jaffab View Post
        So if I can sum things up correctly, the current thinking is (in terms of Hector visits, vat, tax and IR35 only)...

        IPSE = IPSE help on tax investigations,
        IPSE+ =IPSE help on tax investigations and compliance checks plus cash compensation for tax compliance meetings - but no cover for fines, back tax etc
        QDOS TL35 = Free contract reviews, IF (and only if) they are happy are you covered, but if found inside IR35 after review, they cover any tax fines/interest charges

        Qs...
        1) How many IR35 investigations have IPSE lost (if its none, then why does everybody not just use IPSE, so why is there a TL35 product at all)
        2) I read various arguments on other threads about QDOS never actually having paid out on TL35 - is this correct?
        3) There was also discussions about QDOS backing out of investigations or asking for more money (between 7.5k to 10k) but IPSE stepping in
        4) It would appear QDOS do IR35 contract reviews by IPSE do not - but then, as it seems from other discussions that Hector can ignore contracts and go to the client to ask for actual working practices (in terms of substitution (which has to have actually been invoked rather than just stated) and SDC), maybe the contract review is not so great after all?

        Is this correct? Anything I have missed?

        My own situation is that I have been a contractor/freelancer for 14 years - no involvement by Hector other than the usual tax code changes and the regular payment of PAYE, divi tax, corp tax, end of year filing etc. But I feel I am due for an audit at some point coming up. My work is 50% freelance (true product development/supply at fixed cost) and 50% contract. 70% of my contracts have been in the public sector (changing to private come Christmas if I can). I want to get some backup should Hector come sniffing, but dont want to pay over the top on things which wont be of any value to me. My own accountant has just started offering (flogging) tax investigation insurance at £115 a year which covers their costs for any investigation, but its all on FreeAgent so anybody could help in an investigation, but their offer got me thinking about some soft of cover to sleep a little better at night.
        Go mad. Phone IPSE and QDOS and ask them directly.

        As far as I know neither IPSE nor QDOS have lost cases in years. My indifference to TLC35 and IPSE's equivalent (Abbey Tax's Survive 35) stems from that; you are insuring against something that they are convinced won't happen else they won't sell you the insurance.

        And as I keep saying it's not all about IR35. There are many other gotchas out there about to bite. We need the widest cover, support and information we can get.
        Blog? What blog...?

        Comment


          #64
          I can't offer any answers to the questions being posed here and quite frankly I don't think you'll ever get them to any level of satisfaction. I can however offer a solution. Buy both of them.

          It's 250 quid(ish) for each... which it isn't really as I saved on the contract review from QDOS and I can potentially make back more than I paid out on the IPSE+ membership on the Advantage scheme, business interruption option and possibly jury service and the others. In a bad year I can make more money having both than not!

          For that money and the sheet amount of benefit from both let alone the lack of stress and having to worry about it then getting both is just a no brainer.

          If you are confident in what you know as Mal is then don't get both. If you are unsure and are going to spend hours investigating and fretting then get both.

          It's as simple as that IMO.
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #65
            I have both QDOS and IPSE+. Peace of mind at ScruffTowers.

            I have used QDOS for reviews over the past 3 years for every contract and renewal.
            I was an IPSE Consultative Council Member, until the BoD abolished it. I am not an IPSE Member, since they have no longer have any relevance to me, as an IT Contractor. Read my lips...I recommend QDOS for ALL your Insurance requirements (Contact me for a referral code).

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              I can't offer any answers to the questions being posed here and quite frankly I don't think you'll ever get them to any level of satisfaction. I can however offer a solution. Buy both of them.

              It's 250 quid(ish) for each... which it isn't really as I saved on the contract review from QDOS and I can potentially make back more than I paid out on the IPSE+ membership on the Advantage scheme, business interruption option and possibly jury service and the others. In a bad year I can make more money having both than not!

              For that money and the sheet amount of benefit from both let alone the lack of stress and having to worry about it then getting both is just a no brainer.

              If you are confident in what you know as Mal is then don't get both. If you are unsure and are going to spend hours investigating and fretting then get both.

              It's as simple as that IMO.
              Plus the thousands in Amazon vouchers you've earned over the years for referrals

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
                Plus the thousands in Amazon vouchers you've earned over the years for referrals
                I so wish this was the case.



                Yet another thing I fail at. I haven't even earned enough to keep my Bieber collection up to date!!
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #68
                  A quick google found an accounting firm with a link through with a 15% discount to IPSE+, spo thats not so bad.... poised on the bank details form now....

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by jaffab View Post
                    A quick google found an accounting firm with a link through with a 15% discount to IPSE+, spo thats not so bad.... poised on the bank details form now....
                    You can get 15% through CUK as well. Try reading the adverts...

                    The magic word is "CONTRACTOR16"
                    Blog? What blog...?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X