Originally posted by northernladuk
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
 - Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
 
6 month Clause in my Agency Contract restricting me going direct
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Thank you very much for the advice. I am 18 months into my first big contract and I've managed to negotiate the rate I wanted with the agency and client and will be doing another 6 months here so a success story. The handcuff rule will still be there when i leave at Christmas but I will have more equity time and experience in contracting ways. - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
6 month Clause in my Agency Contract
I have a similar problem but with a Twist
 
The Agency that I was contracting through Closed down, why I have no Idea, but as my last 6 months was finalized ending 30th June they ceased trading!!! Now I am coming to the end of my contract and the company wish to keep me for Longer, I had a clause in my last contract restricting me from going direct, but since they no longer exist as a trading entity can the former directors of the company still hold that restriction ?Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Nope.Originally posted by Talos View PostI have a similar problem but with a Twist
 
The Agency that I was contracting through Closed down, why I have no Idea, but as my last 6 months was finalized ending 30th June they ceased trading!!! Now I am coming to the end of my contract and the company wish to keep me for Longer, I had a clause in my last contract restricting me from going direct, but since they no longer exist as a trading entity can the former directors of the company still hold that restriction ?
The party that put in that restriction no longer exists - so go direct or use another agency."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Who's going to argue it if they don't exist????Originally posted by Talos View PostI have a similar problem but with a Twist
 
The Agency that I was contracting through Closed down, why I have no Idea, but as my last 6 months was finalized ending 30th June they ceased trading!!! Now I am coming to the end of my contract and the company wish to keep me for Longer, I had a clause in my last contract restricting me from going direct, but since they no longer exist as a trading entity can the former directors of the company still hold that restriction ?

							
						'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Thanks, I just wanted to checkOriginally posted by SueEllen View PostNope.
The party that put in that restriction no longer exists - so go direct or use another agency.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Does anyone have experience of getting out of this clause if ClientCo no longer has the agency on their PSL ?
CheersWe got the Oystons out like we said we wouldComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
be wary of this though. What if another company has taken over the business, either partially or wholly? The contract may now be with a new agency and the clause still enforceable.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNope.
The party that put in that restriction no longer exists - so go direct or use another agency.See You Next TuesdayComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
On a tangent, what would happen if original agency was in say liquidation?Originally posted by Lance View Postbe wary of this though. What if another company has taken over the business, either partially or wholly? The contract may now be with a new agency and the clause still enforceable.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
True but the agency needs to tell both the contractor and client they have taken over the existing business.Originally posted by Lance View Postbe wary of this though. What if another company has taken over the business, either partially or wholly? The contract may now be with a new agency and the clause still enforceable.
If neither of the parties know that a new middle man exists how are they suppose to do business with them?"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
You need to keep an eye on who buys their assets and goodwill.Originally posted by perplexed View PostOn a tangent, what would happen if original agency was in say liquidation?
Also read your contract. Lots contain clauses that means you aren't bound to the contract in cases of administration.
Personally I would let the client know the agency is in liquidation as they probably have such clauses in their contract with the agency."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
 
- Home
 - News & Features
 - First Timers
 - IR35 / S660 / BN66
 - Employee Benefit Trusts
 - Agency Workers Regulations
 - MSC Legislation
 - Limited Companies
 - Dividends
 - Umbrella Company
 - VAT / Flat Rate VAT
 - Job News & Guides
 - Money News & Guides
 - Guide to Contracts
 - Successful Contracting
 - Contracting Overseas
 - Contractor Calculators
 - MVL
 - Contractor Expenses
 
Advertisers

				
				
				
				
Comment