• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Spot the problem

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    It's one reason but just one of many.
    Polly wants a cracker?

    Comment


      #22
      Spot the problem

      Originally posted by gruntling View Post
      Scotch Whiskey into India is one example. India is quite a big market after all...
      Is the issue there due to non-existent export tariffs or Indian import tariffs?
      International Trade
      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        Is the issue there due to non-existent export tariffs or Indian import tariffs?
        International Trade
        You aren't understanding me.

        Indian tariffs on Scotch imports must be reduced

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by gruntling View Post
          A lower exchange rate, all things being equal, makes imports more expensive and exports cheaper. That's how international trade works.


          Read back what you’ve written. On the one hand, you say that expensive raw imports (due to tariffs) hurt U.K. exporters. On the other hand, you imply that expensive raw imports (due to exchange rates) don’t bother the German exporters at all.

          Leaving aside whether our tariffs on raw material imports are expensive at all (they’re not), this is cakism - you can’t have it both ways.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by meridian View Post


            Read back what you’ve written. On the one hand, you say that expensive raw imports (due to tariffs) hurt U.K. exporters. On the other hand, you imply that expensive raw imports (due to exchange rates) don’t bother the German exporters at all.

            Leaving aside whether our tariffs on raw material imports are expensive at all (they’re not), this is cakism - you can’t have it both ways.
            There is no contraction in what I've written at all. It's how economics works and prices are set.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by gruntling View Post
              I didn't claim that at all.

              The main problem with the UK trying to do trade deals with India is that we can't while we remain in the EU.
              We could have, as part of the EU. But we didn’t want to accept the FTA conditions. There isn’t one main problem, but plenty of smaller ones such as India’s reluctance to lower duties on goods, India’s reluctance to open up the services sector, the EU’s reluctance to lower food and goods standards to India’s level, and the UK’s reluctance to accept more visas.

              Why would those conditions be any easier now that we’re not part of a larger bloc?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by meridian View Post
                We could have, as part of the EU. But we didn’t want to accept the FTA conditions. There isn’t one main problem, but plenty of smaller ones such as India’s reluctance to lower duties on goods, India’s reluctance to open up the services sector, the EU’s reluctance to lower food and goods standards to India’s level, and the UK’s reluctance to accept more visas.

                Why would those conditions be any easier now that we’re not part of a larger bloc?
                Well the trade talks with India haven't been easy that's true but the UK probably has stronger links with India than most EU countries which may work in our favour.

                India says UK free trade deal will take years - BBC News is a fairly good summary of where things stood in 2017.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by gruntling View Post
                  Scotch Whiskey into India is one example. India is quite a big market after all...

                  Pah I ignore your 1.3 Billion customers in one country and remind you the EU gives your very limited access to 500 million !
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by vetran View Post
                    Pah I ignore your 1.3 Billion customers in one country and remind you the EU gives your very limited access to 500 million !
                    Even if every person including babies would drink Scottish Whiskey in India the impact on the overall economy would be just a drop in the ocean. Besides that 80% of the Indian population can probably not even one bottle per year, it would be an outrageous luxury for most of them.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      Pah I ignore your 1.3 Billion customers in one country and remind you the EU gives your very limited access to 500 million !
                      1.3 Billion customers with an average yearly income of $600, compared with 500 million with an average yearly income of $20,000.

                      That's $0.78 billion (India) and $10 billion (EU). Pretty clear which is the biggest market.
                      Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X