Originally posted by Yorkie62
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Brexit surcharge
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostYawn.
Lose the argument on Brexit, dig up a ten-year-old article to find (surprise!) German company had links with Nazis in WWII.
Pathetic. Try sticking to the subject next time.
Glad you are so forgiving about using slave labour and working them to death.
It seems to be a reason for rewriting history in the UK 200 years ago despite slavery being legal internationally. Working them to death was not profitable.
But cue WWII when it most definitely is not legal, its intention was genocide not profit and its all OK because they are your mates.
Just channelling my inner old smeg.
By the way the reason its a >10 year old article is it took them 50 years to admit it. I think that's pretty close to the subject.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostMost amusing, coming from a Mail reader.
yeah coz you are obsessed with 2 published articles 70 years ago, not Porsche finally admitting brutalising slave labour a decade ago.
You are a sad fecker.Comment
-
So when is the Mail going to apologise for supporting Hitler?Originally posted by vetran View Postyeah coz you are obsessed with 2 published articles 70 years ago, not Porsche finally admitting brutalising slave labour a decade ago.
You are a sad fecker.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo when is the Mail going to apologise for supporting Hitler?
about the same time Germany, France & Italy's major companies do?Comment
-
France was occupied, Germany done more than just apologyseOriginally posted by vetran View Postabout the same time Germany, France & Italy's major companies do?Comment
-
So is that what the Mail is waiting for? It would like to apologise for supporting Hitler but feels it should wait?Originally posted by vetran View Postabout the same time Germany, France & Italy's major companies do?Comment
-
I signed the contract, with Horton SEAT (a UK company), on the 22nd January 20-19. I checked my contract last night and it is with the dealership, which is a UK company, and not SEAT. It will be interesting to see, but as far as I can make out Porsche are asking their customers, who' cars may be delivered after 29th march, to sign what is effectively as contract amendment which increased the price of the car to cover the import tax in the event of a no deal Brexit.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhen did you sign contract to have one?Comment
-
Because the Wail doesn't feel it needs to apologise. It believes it was right to support him then and it still thinks his ideas are the right way to go.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo is that what the Mail is waiting for? It would like to apologise for supporting Hitler but feels it should wait?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Because people who buy Porches new buy them from OPCs, not from independent companies.Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostI signed the contract, with Horton SEAT (a UK company), on the 22nd January 20-19. I checked my contract last night and it is with the dealership, which is a UK company, and not SEAT. It will be interesting to see, but as far as I can make out Porsche are asking their customers, who' cars may be delivered after 29th march, to sign what is effectively as contract amendment which increased the price of the car to cover the import tax in the event of a no deal Brexit.
Just because you bought your car one way doesn't mean everyone else buys cars exactly the same way. Also, you may have checked who you signed the contract with, but did you check the details of the contract, the prices, the get-out clauses?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02

Comment