- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Mr Bercow
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostGosh, I'm unfamiliar with the mechanism through which the UK courts might rule on the internal procedures of the House of Commons in light of its "exclusive cognisance".Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostSo it's all legal then?
Simply against convention, and against expert advice, and illustrative of virtue signalling with no immediate, practical, effect, but with probable (significant) long-term effect on the partiality of the speaker (more akin to the U.S.).
Nothing more, nothing less.
HTH.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostAbsolutely, perfectly in order. Nothing to see in that respect, and I'm not arguing to the contrary.
Simply against convention, and against expert advice, and illustrative of virtue signalling with no immediate, practical, effect, but with probable (significant) long-term effect on the partiality of the speaker (more akin to the U.S.).
Nothing more, nothing less.
HTH.
I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostSo you don't like it not because it's wrong but because your side lost. That's parliamentary democracy in action.
You can take a horse to water...
Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post"My side."
You can take a horse to water...
I'm alright JackComment
-
It seems totally undemocratic to prevent duly elected Representatives of the People from voting on whatever they deem appropriate.
Govt is supposed to command the Majority of the House.Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostYou appear to be virtue signalling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt seems totally undemocratic to prevent duly elected Representatives of the People from voting on whatever they deem appropriate.
Govt is supposed to command the Majority of the House.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostOr proffering expertise and correcting rudimentary mistakes.
I'm alright JackComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment