• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.

Remainers pushing for second referendum think Brexiteers are 'thick' and 'prejudiced

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Thankfully I've only had one conversation IRL with a Brexiteer about Brexit. He seemed very angry about gay marriage, Turkey joining the EU and immigrants pricing his half Spanish kids out of the housing market. This was why he voted Brexiteer.

    listening to your stepfather when he is pissed is not talking to a Brexiter.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    You don't get a vote in accepting them, your duly elected representatives in Parliament do. That's democracy for you.

    HTH.
    You may be struggling with understanding that my MP, like the vast majority, will vote to reject the terms.

    I don't see any clear route beyond that where this deal will be accepted or that leaving in March can be stopped.

    Joyous.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    That's because you're looking in the wrong place. Try looking in the Conservative Party manifesto.

    Conservative manifesto summary: Key points at-a-glance - BBC News
    Don't confuse them with reality and fact. Brexiters think the whole process is based on that one piece of paper only. FFS, they do constantly live up to the idea that they're all

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    "Agree terms of future partnership with EU alongside withdrawal, both within the two years allowed under Article 50 "

    Fantastic, they agreed them, they are tulipe, we're not accepting them.

    Bring on the cliff edge.
    You don't get a vote in accepting them, your duly elected representatives in Parliament do. That's democracy for you.

    HTH.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    "Agree terms of future partnership with EU alongside withdrawal, both within the two years allowed under Article 50 "

    Fantastic, they agreed them, they are tulipe, we're not accepting them.

    Bring on the cliff edge.
    The terms of the future partnership have not been agreed.
    But I guess it's not the first time a Brexiter has been ignorant/misinformed.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    That's because you're looking in the wrong place. Try looking in the Conservative Party manifesto.

    Conservative manifesto summary: Key points at-a-glance - BBC News
    "Agree terms of future partnership with EU alongside withdrawal, both within the two years allowed under Article 50 "

    Fantastic, they agreed them, they are tulipe, we're not accepting them.

    Bring on the cliff edge.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    And can article 50 actually be rescinded? without penalty? after wasting two years of 28 country's time and effort?
    Really?

    Yes, possibly. We'll know this week.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    That's odd, can't quite remember that being an option...
    That's because you're looking in the wrong place. Try looking in the Conservative Party manifesto.

    Conservative manifesto summary: Key points at-a-glance - BBC News

    Exit the European single market and customs union but seek a "deep and special partnership" including comprehensive free trade and customs agreement
    Vote in both Houses of Parliament on "final agreement" for Brexit
    Assess whether to continue with specific European programmes and it "will be reasonable that we make a contribution" to the ones which continue
    Agree terms of future partnership with EU alongside withdrawal, both within the two years allowed under Article 50

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    That's odd, can't quite remember that being an option...

    And can article 50 actually be rescinded? without penalty? after wasting two years of 28 country's time and effort?
    Really?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    It did indeed, but not by which mechanism. Both Norway and Canada were often put up as examples by leave as deals we would look to base our deal on. There was never a mention on no deal; this is a more recent idea put forward by JRM and his cronies at ERG.

    People, therefore, never voted for no deal. They voted for this government to negotiate a deal. They have now done this. If the people do t like this deal they should have a choice to reject it, and thus also reject brexit.

    You can't have it all ways dear boy. You wanted a brexit deal, you have a brexit deal. Suck it up, or vote to remain in the EU (assuming MPs reject the deal first on your behalf)

    That's odd, can't quite remember that being an option...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X