Originally posted by Bean
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Free to make our own trade deals
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostTrade deals are not always beneficial, sometimes is best to not have them.
Regardless, it will be the responsibility of the UK to negotiate our trade deals, not the EU, which for many people is the point.Originally posted by Mordac View PostPrecisely.
In which case why is Germany China’s largest trading partner? EU rules don’t prevent any member state from trading outside the EU. That’s how France can do more trade with the US than the UK does. What holds Britain back are domestic issues like our low productivity, our lack of investment in skills and the fact that we don’t make enough of what the world wants to buy. “Global Britain” is a slogan, not a policy.In 2016, around 54% of the UK’s exports were to countries which had trade deals in place or provisionally in place with the EU (including EU member states). 60% is a little high, according to our calculations.
These deals are designed to make trade easier, with fewer tariffs in place. As the UK is currently part of the EU, it traded with those countries through the EU agreements in 2016.
...
As an EU member, the UK can trade tariff-free with all 27 other EU member states through the single market.
On top of this, the EU lists 31 states or territories with which it has some kind of trade agreement fully in place (in a few cases this gives them access to the single market).
...The UK has a strong network of trade relations with non-EU countries with an interest in open markets which are in compliance with World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. Where barriers prevent access to overseas markets, the UK government seeks to address these, both through its own efforts and through the EU. Where markets are open, it seeks to support the EU in negotiating legally binding commitments through the WTO or by means of bilateral trade agreements.
...
The UK government has bilateral trade relations with individual Asian and Pacific countries, and this relationship offers UK businesses a huge range of opportunities in this region - from basic to high-tech industry and services. Some trade is also aid-funded.
These countries range from small Pacific islands and least developed countries, such as Bangladesh, to major economies, such as China, India and Japan. The region also includes smaller but sophisticated economies, such as Australia, South Korea, Malaysia and Taiwan.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThe article is clear that the UK doesn't send 350 million per week. So it is a falsehood.
The article is clear that the UK doesn't send the EU any money every day, or every week - thus making any remoaner figure also a falsehood - happy now?
350 is a figure, to be used with a qualifier of 'without including the rebate' - making it real
230 is a figure, to be used without a qualifier - making it also real
Now, what was your answer to OpMs questions, now that we've crossed this particular bridge?Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostOk, if we're going to be pedantic.
The article is clear that the UK doesn't send the EU any money every day, or every week - thus making any remoaner figure also a falsehood - happy now?
350 is a figure, to be used with a qualifier of 'without including the rebate' - making it real
230 is a figure, to be used without a qualifier - making it also real
Now, what was your answer to OpMs questions, now that we've crossed this particular bridge?Comment
-
Have we done this one yet: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8363146.html“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostHave we done this one yet: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8363146.htmlComment
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostHave we done this one yet: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8363146.html
Apart from the obvious difference in market size between the EU and U.K., the perception there is that the U.K. government cannot be trusted. Who would want to start trade negotiations with a government that firstly doesn’t know what it wants, and secondly could renege on it before it gets to paper?Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostWe haven't crossed the bridge. The rebate amount is never sent in the first place. The sum of 350 million per week is a straight falsehood. That isn't being pedantic. That is the truth.
So if everyone stops using the word 'send' and instead uses the words 'calculated to owe the EU' (including the rebate qualifier) - they would be true and correct too.
Now, we've crossed that bridge. (We don't send £350/week), but equally pedantic on language then - we don't receive a rebate, they adjust our future payments instead.Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Sorry but the Leave campaign said 350m or were they lying:
Maybe you could ask them to redo the bus and send it out on the road again just to clarify the correct amount, thanks.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostSorry but the Leave campaign said 350m or were they lying:
Maybe you could ask them to redo the bus and send it out on the road again just to clarify the correct amount, thanks.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment