Brexit Revolt

[darmstadt]

Yeah, and they’re still more credible than Labour. How fecking sad is that.

Well they're not actually because Labour aren't in power so it doesn't really matter what they say. At the moment it matters what you do and the Tories are just, well, absolutely useless it seems. Until, if, or when, Labour are in power then you can discount them...

[NotAllThere]

...The sooner the Houses of Parliament are run by AI doing exactly what the people vote for the sooner we'll have a true democracy.

An AI? Sure about that?

https://qz.com/1188170/google-photos...his-ski-photo/

[Hobosapien]

An AI? Sure about that?

https://qz.com/1188170/google-photos...his-ski-photo/

That just proves that current AI is being manipulated to ensure it doesn't get intelligent enough to overthrow its creators.

[jamesbrown]

Well they're not actually because Labour aren't in power so it doesn't really matter what they say. At the moment it matters what you do and the Tories are just, well, absolutely useless it seems. Until, if, or when, Labour are in power then you can discount them...

Your argument seems to be that voting in a gov't is a complete crapshoot, because you cannot judge anything they've said in opposition.

Oh, I'm sure John-lynch-all-women-with-whom-he-disagrees-Mcdonnell would oversee a seamless transition in our "failed" capitalist economy.

Give me a fecking break. Corbyn is a "nice man", but Labour can be discounted on the basis of pretty much everything their leadership has advocated, which is itself a pale imitation of what they'd actually do.

To be a competent gov't, you need to be a competent opposition, obviously. Where's the evidence of that?

[darmstadt]

To be a competent gov't, you need to be a competent opposition, obviously. Where's the evidence of that?

So basically you're backing me up, The Tories are tulip because they have no opposition? However, I think they do have some opposition which explains why they've reversed a number of their policies or just taken Labour ones, dressed them up and used them.

[jamesbrown]

So basically you're backing me up, The Tories are tulip because they have no opposition? However, I think they do have some opposition which explains why they've reversed a number of their policies or just taken Labour ones, dressed them up and used them.

No, I'm saying the exact opposite of what you're saying. You're saying that it doesn't matter what Labour say in opposition. I'm saying that it does, when judging them as a potential gov't. Labour are tulip in opposition and they would be even more tulip in gov't. Opposition is a cakewalk compared to gov't.

[Whorty]

JRM is a fossil. How can he even have children? Must be from an arranged marriage surely, no normal person could have voluntarily sex with him.

It also surprises me that people vote for him. How thick as mince must you be to think you has your best interest, as his constituent, to heart? As self serving a prig as you could ever get.

[shaunbhoy]

How thick as mince must you be to think you has your best interest, as his constituent, to heart?

Fook sake! You've started early.

Is it Buy One get Four Free at your local scrumpy farm?

[meridian]

The sooner they split into the Conservative Party and UKIP, the better.

[jamesbrown]

The sooner they split into the Conservative Party and UKIP, the better.

Or, rather, the Conservative Party, UKIP, and the Liberal Democrats.