• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

First round of post-Brexit subsidies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    That will reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, bring British Wildlife back to the British Countryside and we'll all have more time to walk in it and enjoy it.

    ...until the Countrycide Alliance come along and insist on murdering all British wildlife in the name of "sport"
    So as we have always suspected we will need to spend the money we would have given to the EU (of which they took a cut and then gave some of it back to our farms as EU subsides) and give it directly to the farmers without the EU having a cut....

    And all of that means fox hunting will come back....

    Are you sure?

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
      All Meadows and flower filled fields, what's not to like?

      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
      That will reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, bring British Wildlife back to the British Countryside and we'll all have more time to walk in it and enjoy it.

      ...until the Countrycide Alliance come along and insist on murdering all British wildlife in the name of "sport"
      Originally posted by original PM View Post
      So as we have always suspected we will need to spend the money we would have given to the EU (of which they took a cut and then gave some of it back to our farms as EU subsides) and give it directly to the farmers without the EU having a cut....

      And all of that means fox hunting will come back....

      Are you sure?


      I guess you're confused if you selectively quote, or take things out of context.

      Meadows and flower filled fields will bring back wildlife to the countryside. That's got nothing to do with the EU, that's a natural fact. Sorry if you find nature confusing.
      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        I guess you're confused if you selectively quote, or take things out of context.

        Meadows and flower filled fields will bring back wildlife to the countryside. That's got nothing to do with the EU, that's a natural fact. Sorry if you find nature confusing.
        does that mean the bloody foxes will bugger off back to the countryside and stop wrecking my bins????

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by WTFH View Post
          Meadows and flower filled fields will bring back wildlife to the countryside.
          As long as it does not attract those pesky cyclists.....

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by WTFH View Post
            ...until the Countrycide Alliance come along and insist on murdering all British wildlife in the name of "sport"
            Wow. Seriously?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Platypus View Post
              Wow. Seriously?
              Raptors such as Buzzards, Hawks, Harriers, Kestrels and Kites are regularly trapped and killed because they will take one or two pheasant chicks from a shoot. It's illegal, but even the Torygraph ran a story - maybe some of it's readership who are pro-hunting see it as legal advice:
              http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...angered-birds/

              The culling of badgers is promoted by the CA, because testing to find out which ones were sick and dealing with that is more difficult than eradicating the species.
              The people going on hunts claim that the occasional fox gets killed, but it's only ever the sick or injured, so they say they are helping the fox population by getting rid of them. That's basically the same argument that is used by people who kill lions and elephants in Africa - by getting rid of the old, the sick and the weak you are helping species survive.
              I would argue more strongly that until these people can prove over years of study that their logic works for humans, they shouldn't be trying it out on wild animals.
              …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                Raptors such as Buzzards, Hawks, Harriers, Kestrels and Kites are regularly trapped and killed because they will take one or two pheasant chicks from a shoot. It's illegal, but even the Torygraph ran a story - maybe some of it's readership who are pro-hunting see it as legal advice:
                Police fail to prosecute single person for killing endangered birds of prey in 2016, warn RSPB

                The culling of badgers is promoted by the CA, because testing to find out which ones were sick and dealing with that is more difficult than eradicating the species.
                The people going on hunts claim that the occasional fox gets killed, but it's only ever the sick or injured, so they say they are helping the fox population by getting rid of them. That's basically the same argument that is used by people who kill lions and elephants in Africa - by getting rid of the old, the sick and the weak you are helping species survive.
                I would argue more strongly that until these people can prove over years of study that their logic works for humans, they shouldn't be trying it out on wild animals.
                I thought foxes were a pest and in some areas have been known to attack humans - making them a predator.

                I guess until one of your offspring is attacked then you will live under the assumption it is not a problem.

                It's also interesting that fox hunting has been in existence since pretty much man could hunt until it was banned in 2002 (depending on the country you live in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_hunting) so that would seem to imply that we managed not to completely kill off all the foxes in the previous approx 50,000 years so......

                And finally who was against fox hunting was it
                a) A bunch of liberal townies whose only knowledge of the countryside was the few days a year they visited it or

                b) The people who have been managing the countryside for generations

                It was a - who knew absolutely fook all about it - other than to protect the cute likkle foxes.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                  The people going on hunts claim that the occasional fox gets killed, but it's only ever the sick or injured, so they say they are helping the fox population by getting rid of them. That's basically the same argument that is used by people who kill lions and elephants in Africa - by getting rid of the old, the sick and the weak you are helping species survive.
                  I would argue more strongly that until these people can prove over years of study that their logic works for humans, they shouldn't be trying it out on wild animals.
                  Maybe that's what the EU will decide to do with the UK eventually
                  Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
                    Maybe that's what the EU will decide to do with the UK eventually
                    What hunt us down and kill us - last time I looked that was tried twice in the 20th century and did not work then.

                    but I suppose 3rd times a charm?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      There is a myth that "country folk" like holding on fox hunts. The truth is the landed gentry go on fox hunts. The landed gentry control and run the countryside to suit themselves, they love writing letters to their lease holders what they can and can't do on their land. They refuse to build and maintain public pathways, cycle paths or anything that might hold up their huge SUVs up on the way to the Fox hunt or pheasant hunts which benefits no-one but the local Lord of the manor and his buddies. My mother hears complaints from villagers who talk about the dead hand of the landowners hanging over it.

                      When I visit the countryside I've never been attacked by a fox.
                      Last edited by BlasterBates; 4 January 2018, 17:01.
                      I'm alright Jack

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X