Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Chlorinated Chickens are OK
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy View PostA bit of bleach is ok, at least you know it's actually Chicken ... Unlike your EU burger that will be running the 16:00 at Leicester ...
It is only in the UK that the scandal occurred where the supermarkets tried to buy the cheapest product possible and labelled it as beef without checking what they were buying.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostNothing wrong with horse meat as long as it is labelled as such.
Originally posted by WTFH View PostIn most European countries it is correctly labelled and served as horse meat.
Originally posted by WTFH View PostIt is only in the UK that the scandal occurred
https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/off..._meat/qanda_en and Wikipedia if you want..
Originally posted by WTFH View Postwhere the supermarkets tried to buy the cheapest product possible and labelled it as beef without checking what they were buying.
So what are the regulators/food inspectors for, if not to stop this exact thing?Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
As i recall, one of the companies at the centre of the scandal was called DRAAP products.
Run by a dutchman.
PAARD is dutch for horseComment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostWho, according to you, is the onus on to check that meat, labelled as 'X' is 'X' - supermarkets?
So what are the regulators/food inspectors for, if not to stop this exact thing?
If your order was for quality beef, then you should be getting what you ordered. The regulators should be checking.
So, the first question would be: what was actually ordered?
Secondly: what checks were done to ensure the product matched the requirement?
Thirdly: who found the problem? Well, that one is easy to answer - the EU regulators found it. They found it, they started the process to stop it.
And it's very interesting if you read the whole page you referred to, you'll see that the EU has acted on this.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostIf your order is for "meat" without specifying the animal, then you get what you ordered. No issue with the regulators, your attempt to blame the EU is false.
If your order was for quality beef, then you should be getting what you ordered. The regulators should be checking.
Originally posted by WTFH View PostSo, the first question would be: what was actually ordered?
Originally posted by WTFH View PostSecondly: what checks were done to ensure the product matched the requirement?
Originally posted by WTFH View PostThirdly: who found the problem? Well, that one is easy to answer - the EU regulators found it. They found it, they started the process to stop it.
And it's very interesting if you read the whole page you referred to, you'll see that the EU has acted on this.
The text of the frst Q, from the link I previously gave you is;
"The problem was first picked up by Irish food inspectors who announced in mid-January 2013 that they had found horse meat in frozen beef burgers. Subsequently, the UK informed the Commission on 8 February 2013 that a UK company (Findus UK) had been selling beef lasagne supplied by a French company (Comigel-Tavola Luxembourg) which tests showed contained between 80-100% horse meat."
Do you notice the word Beef in there somewhere?
Did you read the link I provided, or just find it difficult to understand it?
I did read more than just that 1st Q (apparently you didn't ) - there processes were found wanting:
"Several lessons have been drawn from the horse meat fraud. The most important is probably that large scale, cross-border fraudulent schemes that take advantage of the weaknesses of an increasingly globalised food supply can impact hugely on consumers and operators, on thus on the economy. Constant vigilance from operators and competent authorities towards economically motivated fraud, that can be perpetrated at any step of the food supply chain is needed."
The EU has admitted, clear as day - that at the time of the scandal, they were not a competent authorityOriginally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostThe text of the frst Q, from the link I previously gave you is;
"The problem was first picked up by Irish food inspectors who announced in mid-January 2013 that they had found horse meat in frozen beef burgers. Subsequently, the UK informed the Commission on 8 February 2013 that a UK company (Findus UK) had been selling beef lasagne supplied by a French company (Comigel-Tavola Luxembourg) which tests showed contained between 80-100% horse meat."
Do you notice the word Beef in there somewhere?
Did you read the link I provided, or just find it difficult to understand it?
Findus were selling lasagne they had labelled "beef"
That doesn't say that Findus ordered beef, does it?
That says that Findus sold it as beef.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostYes, I noticed the word beef. Did you?
Findus were selling lasagne they had labelled "beef"
That doesn't say that Findus ordered beef, does it?
That says that Findus sold it as beef.
From wiki:
"On 14 February 2013, the French government stated that French meat processing company À la Table de Spanghero knowingly sold horse meat labelled as beef, and that their licence was suspended while an inquiry continues.[31] Spanghero imported meat from Romania and sold it on to another French company, Comigel, which made frozen ready meals at its factory in Luxembourg. French Consumer Affairs Minister Benoît Hamon said the meat had left Romania clearly and correctly labelled as horse and that it was afterwards that it was relabelled as beef by Spanghero.[31] The investigation also said some blame may rest with Comigel, claiming the staff there should have noticed anomalies in the paperwork, and realised from the smell and look of the meat once it was defrosted that it was not beef.[31]
Comigel[edit]
On 7 February 2013, Findus announced that in a sample of 18 beef lasagne products that it tested, 11 contained between 60% and 100% horse meat.[32] It was also revealed that some of the products sold had minced meat declared as beef that was 60–100% horse meat.[33] The source of the horse meat was third party supplier Comigel, a French-headquartered frozen ready meal producer, from its subsidiary Tavola factory in Capellen, Luxembourg. According to the FSA the company had been alerted by a third-party French supplier on 4 February 2013, and tested its beef lasagne products finding over 50% of the tested products contained horse meat. According to reports both Findus UK and the French supplier withdrew all products related to the third party supplier. The reason for the adulteration was initially stated as "highly likely" criminal activity.[34]
The president of Comigel, Erick Lehagre, told Agence France-Presse that the adulterated meat supplier was Spanghero, a firm owned by Lur Berri and founded in 1970 by Claude and Laurent Spanghero, two former France international rugby players.[35] He said that Spanghero had told him that the meat was not from France, but came from a producer in Romania.[36] On 11 February 2013 France's Consumer Affairs Minister Benoit Hamon warned it "will not hesitate" to take legal action if there is evidence companies had knowingly duped consumers. Hamon said an initial investigation by French safety authorities had found a French company Poujol (Spanghero's holding company) bought frozen meat from a Cypriot trader. That trader had bought it from Dutch food supplier Draap (the Dutch word for horse, Paard spelled backwards), owned by Jan Fasen, who was previously convicted for horse meat fraud in 2007.[37] Draap, in turn, bought it from two Romanian slaughterhouses.[37] Poujol then supplied a factory in Luxembourg, owned by Comigel, which then supplied Findus and the British supermarkets. The Romanian government has stated that there are no contracts between the Romanian abattoirs and any French, Cypriot or Dutch meat processors.[38]
On 8 February 2013, Findus announced that it would no longer accept meat from Comigel, and stopped further deliveries of the product in question. On the same day, Findus UK published a public apology on its website, also announcing that, following DNA testing, three of its products were found to contain horse tissue. These are the 320, 350 and 500 gram packages of Findus Beef Lasagne; the company offered a refund for products purchased.[39] Findus Sverige AB also announced a recall of its 375 gram packs of ready-made single-portion lasagne (code 63957), and published a contact number for customers who had already purchased the products.[40] On 8 February 2013 supermarket chain Aldi announced that it would withdraw from sale Today's Special Frozen Beef Lasagne and Today's Special Frozen Spaghetti Bolognese, supplied by Comigel, after tests found the meat content to be between 30 and 100% horse."
Oh wait, you're not correct
Seriously, how hard is it to read the links provided?
(I've put bold to lead you through the story/timeline)
Have you landed on your head recently to attribute the decline in your reading comprehension?
Take care on slippery or icy surfaces WTFHOriginally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
Originally posted by Bean View Post"Several lessons have been drawn from the horse meat fraud. The most important is probably that large scale, cross-border fraudulent schemes that take advantage of the weaknesses of an increasingly globalised food supply can impact hugely on consumers and operators, on thus on the economy. Constant vigilance from operators and competent authorities towards economically motivated fraud, that can be perpetrated at any step of the food supply chain is needed."
The EU has admitted, clear as day - that at the time of the scandal, they were not a competent authorityComment
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostI wasn't aware that the EU provided a centralised inspection scheme, and that "EU" regulators showed up to QM and inspect foodstuffs. Do you have a link that shows anyone other than British food regulators being responsible for checking food imports into Britain?
It has to be.
Everything is the EU's fault, haven't you read the memo?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment