Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The appeal is really about the wider constitutional question surrounding the Royal Prerogative. Really, HMG was out of its mind to pursue this case after the HC, because the outcome is all but guaranteed, but they wanted to resolve the wider question. In doing so, they've exposed themselves to a heap of ugly possibilities, such as a full Act that can be amended in both houses, one that must be approved by the devolved administrations, and possibly even a deferral to the ECJ on whether A50 is reversible. As I say, there's scope for a constitutional crisis, because so much of our constitution is unwritten. It's bloody frustrating, but they need to be allowed to do their jobs now that HMG has pursued it. I'd expect that a short Act will be sufficient, but then I thought they'd win at the HC too....
I don't quite understand why someone who is so lucid in how he presents his arguments and is so knowledgeable bothers to come on CUK particularly as you never resort to name calling and insults
My understanding (can't find the article) is that the Government believes the Court does not have the authority. This is the A9 of the Bill of Rights I keep referring to.
If the Court specifies how things are done it is effectively appointing itself as the Government.
The Gov't believes a lot of stuff, I'm afraid, but it is essentially putting forward the same arguments it made to the HC, which were comprehensively rejected.
I don't quite understand why someone who is so lucid in how he presents his arguments and is so knowledgeable bothers to come on CUK particularly as you never resort to name calling and insults
Hey DA
I generally reserve name calling and insults for Sas.
And neither of you like being reminded of its strengths and we are, afterall, a services economy. We can trade indicators and readings all day, but it's pretty clear that all the pre-referendum prophecies of instant doom (not lagged or conditional doom, instant doom) were unfounded. However, this is a thread about the SC
And neither of you like being reminded of its strengths and we are, afterall, a services economy. We can trade indicators and readings all day, but it's pretty clear that all the pre-referendum prophecies of instant doom (not lagged or conditional doom, instant doom) were unfounded. However, this is a thread about the SC
And neither of you like being reminded of its strengths and we are, afterall, a services economy.
It is rather concerning though that a substantial chunk of our service economy is trade with Europe suggesting that the current success of services will not continue in the long term, on hard Brexit.
And those services are most definitely not wanted in most of Asia, Africa or South America.
Comment