Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
It's one thing to tweak it by a year every decade or so. It's another to just bump it up to 73-75, which is what you'd need to do to return to a sane balance.
UK life expectancy is 81. If you have been promising someone with average expectancy a 15 year retirement, and he's 55 and put in 30 years paying into the system, you can't just tell him, 'Surprise, it's only going to be 7 years, we changed it to retirement at 74, you aren't working 11 more years, you are working 20.'
Tell him sorry, we're broke, it's going to have to be one more year, and he might not be happy, but there's always risks. But yes, I'd consider it morally dubious to undercut someone who's been paying in with an expectation and then drastically change it.
I'd also consider it morally dubious to just change it for young workers. You can't ask them to work 50 years to support a 15 year retirement for those over 50 right now and then only give them a seven year retirement.
So, morally, I think you have to increase retirement ages gradually. I also think you need to put a lid on state pension increases. The triple lock may have played great politically but economically/fiscally it was a disaster.
Comment