Milleage allowance after coming back to same client?

[northernladuk]

Ok to clarify he cannot claim tax relief on the expense although I think you're being a bit pedantic

You missed a full stop off the end of that.

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

You missed a full stop off the end of that.

[speling bee]

You missed a full stop off the end of that.

I didn't like to point out that 'OK' should be capitalised thus, but now I feel compelled to.

[css_jay99]

erm,
now you lot are confusing me !

I worked full time on client for prior to the 5mth break.

So I would think the 40% rule affects me ....

[speling bee]

erm,
now you lot are confusing me !

I worked full time on client for prior to the 5mth break.

So I would think the 40% rule affects me ....

Assuming it's the same location, then you are almost certainly correct.

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

erm,
now you lot are confusing me !

I worked full time on client for prior to the 5mth break.

So I would think the 40% rule affects me ....

Yes you are correct

[Craig@Clarity]

Morning guys. Not directly related to the thread but in discussions about travel expenses and what is allowable; just be mindful that this area could be the current focus by Hector with the recent case of Dr Samadian vs HMRC and Noel White vs HMRC.

[eek]

Morning guys. Not directly related to the thread but in discussions about travel expenses and what is allowable; just be mindful that this area could be the current focus by Hector with the recent case of Dr Samadian vs HMRC and Noel White vs HMRC.

The test in both cases fell due to both people not being an "itinerant trader". They were both visiting locations regularly less than 40% of the time, but because they had been doing so for so long, they were simply just places of work...

[Craig@Clarity]

I know. Just be aware

[Craig@Clarity]

The test in both cases fell due to both people not being an "itinerant trader".

The buzz word at the moment is "regular and predictable" but itinerant and frequent is what I think they were meant to say.