I guess you are not going to let this one drop so it's back to Cojaks point.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Companies House contributing to identity theft
Collapse
X
-
-
DannyR when you or more likely some vunerable member of your family is ripped of by someone who starts multiple companies and then phoenixes them, you will understand why such data is available. Until the government makes it harder for dodgy directors to do this then everyone including private individuals, regulators and investigative journalists needs access to that information.
Also if I wanted to steal someone's personal details to open a mobile phone or credit card account then it's not that hard particularly in some regions of the country to either intercept the post or go through someone's bins. Oh and you don't even have to do that to screw someone else over with a payday loan."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
DannyR when you or more likely some vunerable member of your family is ripped of by someone who starts multiple companies and then phoenixes them, you will understand why such data is available. Until the government makes it harder for dodgy directors to do this then everyone including private individuals, regulators and investigative journalists needs access to that information.Comment
-
Originally posted by DannyR View PostIt seems to me that giving away the date of birth (or any private information) is not necessary to distinguish people of the same name, I think a unique director id would be enough (or simply a link between the director and all his/her associated companies)Comment
-
Originally posted by DannyR View PostI want public bodies like Companies House, local councils, etc... to avoid helping scammers and criminals stealing people's identity. Is is too much to ask?
It is not difficult to find this stuff anyway, you could just buy a mailing list of thousands (or tens of thousands) of names & addresses.
And Clare already told you, you should not use your home address as your business address. Why isn't it your responsibility to avoid disclosing information you don't want to?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Unfortunately the unique ID isn't enough. I was looking up details of someone I used to know, and found that he now has 4 director IDs. Same name, DOB and address, but the records of his many companies opened and later closed due to not filing accounts are not linked. The only way to see this is to check all of his director IDs separately.
Also, regarding the unique director ID, IMHO this ID should also not something being made official / public but solely used by Companies House for their internal database as such an ID could probably be misused as well. A simple link from one director to all his/her past and present companies (including the companies which accounts haven't been filed) should be enough.
It is not difficult to find this stuff anyway, you could just buy a mailing list of thousands (or tens of thousands) of names & addresses.
And Clare already told you, you should not use your home address as your business address. Why isn't it your responsibility to avoid disclosing information you don't want to?Comment
-
I know of x 3 people in the last 2 months all company directors who have such fraud take place and they believe the fraudsters used company / house info. In all cases bank accounts were opened and they only got wind when activiation codes were posted to them.
I know its been happening for a while due to the info company houses and other websites have but it does seem to be picking up again.I like big butts and I cannot lie.Comment
-
Just an update on this - Companies House will shortly no longer be showing the full date of birth for a director, in an effort to reduce ID theft.
Page 17 here: https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...s-response.pdf
A few more changes detailed there too, in regard to annual returns, being able to add a trading address to the public register, and a faster striking off process.Comment
-
-
...
Governments and unique Id's - now that's an oxymoron - do you have any idea how many duplicated NI numbers are knocking around the country? Here's a clue - neither does the government.
That's why a unique id could never work.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Yesterday 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
Comment