Sorry if this isn't the best sub-forum to post this in, but I have a relatively straightforward query.
Having decided to continue running my business and not return to full time work, we are now looking at buying a house later this. Deposit will be funded from existing savings plus an extra dividend at the beginning of the next tax year (just to defer the tax payment a bit longer) as company has pretty good reserves (I will still be leaving a 6 month war chest in the company).
As we don't want to stretch ourselves too much (and I don't want to eat away all of my war chest), we are looking at a £40k deposit on a house in the region of £210-240k (£250k is our hard limit because of stamp duty but £240k is my soft limit, I really don't want to exceed this).
On average this will give us around an 83% LTV.
Best fixed deals I've seen are with my current bank, First Direct; 5 years fixed at 3.9%. Based on my research, given our LTV, current tracker deals aren't that much better so I'd prefer to take the certainty of a 5 year fixed (with the intention to make regular overpayments).
Long term intention is to take a 5 year fixed, make an average of £5k a year in overpayments and increase our equity in the house to around 35%, greatly increasing our chances of getting an affordable deal at the end of the 5 years, even if interest rates have gone up a few percent.
I've had an informal chat with First Direct and they seem to feel they would be able to lend, pending a proper credit check, if I want to get an agreement in principle. They would calculate affordability based on average of last three years net company profit + my directors salary. It seems quite a few lenders take this approach for small business owners.
So, on the basis of the above, is it worth me going through a broker? Am I likely to get a better deal? It seems like they would be a last resort if for some reason I'm struggling to get an AIP.
EDIT: Forgot to mention, I've been in business since 2009 so have 5 years worth of accounts.
Having decided to continue running my business and not return to full time work, we are now looking at buying a house later this. Deposit will be funded from existing savings plus an extra dividend at the beginning of the next tax year (just to defer the tax payment a bit longer) as company has pretty good reserves (I will still be leaving a 6 month war chest in the company).
As we don't want to stretch ourselves too much (and I don't want to eat away all of my war chest), we are looking at a £40k deposit on a house in the region of £210-240k (£250k is our hard limit because of stamp duty but £240k is my soft limit, I really don't want to exceed this).
On average this will give us around an 83% LTV.
Best fixed deals I've seen are with my current bank, First Direct; 5 years fixed at 3.9%. Based on my research, given our LTV, current tracker deals aren't that much better so I'd prefer to take the certainty of a 5 year fixed (with the intention to make regular overpayments).
Long term intention is to take a 5 year fixed, make an average of £5k a year in overpayments and increase our equity in the house to around 35%, greatly increasing our chances of getting an affordable deal at the end of the 5 years, even if interest rates have gone up a few percent.
I've had an informal chat with First Direct and they seem to feel they would be able to lend, pending a proper credit check, if I want to get an agreement in principle. They would calculate affordability based on average of last three years net company profit + my directors salary. It seems quite a few lenders take this approach for small business owners.
So, on the basis of the above, is it worth me going through a broker? Am I likely to get a better deal? It seems like they would be a last resort if for some reason I'm struggling to get an AIP.
EDIT: Forgot to mention, I've been in business since 2009 so have 5 years worth of accounts.
Comment