Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anyone else watching the progress of the Personal Service Company Lords committee?
Collapse
X
-
Having listened to about an hour of the commentary, I'm not convinced that any of them, some of the experts included, really understand much of this too deeply. Admittedly, it can be harder to respond to ill-informed questions than well-posed questions. -
He's probably right - why have it and not bother enforcing it?Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View PostChap is suggesting that there are not enough IR35 investigations going on there should be 10 times as many!Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Yep. Don't think it had the effect that they intendedOriginally posted by MPwannadecentincome View PostThat can only happen if the employers want to take them onto the payroll - isn't the exact opposite happening since the the millenium?Comment
-
I don't think the Lords have really grasped all the facts - in the last session one of them was referring to P35Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostHaving listened to about an hour of the commentary, I'm not convinced that any of them, some of the experts included, really understand much of this too deeply. Admittedly, it can be harder to respond to ill-informed questions than well-posed questions.
Comment
-
And working through a "Public Service Company"Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI don't think the Lords have really grasped all the facts - in the last session one of them was referring to P35

IMHO it's window dressing for whatever changes they're about to make.Comment
-
-
That's astounding. Just goes to show they haven't a clue when it comes to contracting/freelancing.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostJohn Whiting's (of the OTS) comments from the first meeting are quite telling http://www.parliament.uk/documents/l...Ev2Whiting.pdf Their original intention, with IR35, would be that people would be forced back into the security of employment - page 7 and 8.Blood in your pooComment
-
Haven't seen anything yet about things such as the flexible workforce the country needs or contractors being forced into non-sensible business decisions so as to appear outside IR35.Comment
-
Still a way to go. They have yet to talk to anyone who actually understands contracting, let alone anyone who does it for a living. When they do, a few veils may be lifted...Originally posted by GB9 View PostHaven't seen anything yet about things such as the flexible workforce the country needs or contractors being forced into non-sensible business decisions so as to appear outside IR35.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Cost-benefit. It doesn't rake in very much directly. That's why they are selling its principal benefit as deterrence.Originally posted by d000hg View PostHe's probably right - why have it and not bother enforcing it?
Originally posted by Sausage Surprise View Postand these people run the country ffs
Explains a lot, eh?
Our elected chieftains are even worse, though.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers



Comment