This seems to come up on here a lot. It's amazing how many agencies/clients don't seem to understand this and the VAT on VAT thing is obviously rubbish.
The key is to see it as two supplies...one from the vendor to you which may or may not have had a VAT element, and one for you to the agent, which will ALWAYS have VAT unless it counts as a disbursement.
Unfortunately as has been pointed out, HMRC only care that you charge VAT in your services, including any rebilled expense charges. How much you rebill an expense for (net) is no concern of theirs.
IMO if your contract states that expenses can be recharged "in full" then that should be the gross amount.
Of course, if you're on the standard VAT scheme then you can rebill the net amount without losing out as the whole chain is VAT neutral but if you are in the FRS only re-billing the net cost would mean you potentially lose out (your flat rate surplus should normally cover irrecoverable input VAT up to a limit though).
The key is to see it as two supplies...one from the vendor to you which may or may not have had a VAT element, and one for you to the agent, which will ALWAYS have VAT unless it counts as a disbursement.
Unfortunately as has been pointed out, HMRC only care that you charge VAT in your services, including any rebilled expense charges. How much you rebill an expense for (net) is no concern of theirs.
IMO if your contract states that expenses can be recharged "in full" then that should be the gross amount.
Of course, if you're on the standard VAT scheme then you can rebill the net amount without losing out as the whole chain is VAT neutral but if you are in the FRS only re-billing the net cost would mean you potentially lose out (your flat rate surplus should normally cover irrecoverable input VAT up to a limit though).



Comment