• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Receipts

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Misunderstood

    Originally posted by ASB
    You are mistaken. Receipts are not required. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk//manuals/nimmanual/NIM06030.htm

    And for the OP receipts are not strictly necessary. However this is the most convenient method of satisfying to an inspector the expenditure took place.
    ASB - if you think about what HMRC say in their guidance, the only way that you can do all the checks they suggest is to refer to the receipts.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Bradley
      ASB - if you think about what HMRC say in their guidance, the only way that you can do all the checks they suggest is to refer to the receipts.
      Bradley, I don't dispute that would make it easier but

      "Employees are not required to produce receipts for any amount claimed in respect of incidental overnight expenses (formerly PIEs) as long as it is within the prescribed maximum."

      In order to verify the validity of the PIE claim the IR can verify (from the employer) that you were away on business. They could then request the expense claim for the trip (as per their guidance). They then check this does not include incidental already (e.g. phone, laundry etc).

      There you go. No need at all for a receipt for the incidentals being claimed.

      So for practical purposes it may make it considerably easier to defend a challenge by having the receipts but it is not an absolute requirement.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by ASB
        So for practical purposes it may make it considerably easier to defend a challenge by having the receipts ...
        This is the point I was making - glad you've now caught up

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Bradley
          This is the point I was making
          What you said was that you need the receipt. i.e. an absolute requirement.

          What I actually said was that there is not an absolute requirement for it, but without them it may be difficult.

          Personally I have not had any difficultly getting an inspector to accept it in an aspect enquiry but have not been through a full compliance review since the regime change.

          Originally posted by Bradley
          glad you've now caught up
          I was never behind anyway.

          Comment


            #15
            You know I'm right

            Originally posted by ASB
            What you said was that you need the receipt. i.e. an absolute requirement.
            Need is not an absolute. Perhaps if I'd said required you may have a point.

            In any event the point is that you pretty much are required to have the receipts to fend off Hector and most contractors should therefore retain their receipts.

            Don't feel bad

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Bradley
              Don't feel bad
              That's alright. I don't need to

              Comment


                #17
                The last word?

                Originally posted by ASB
                That's alright. I don't need to
                I'm really happy for you

                Comment

                Working...
                X