Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Weekly Dividend
Collapse
X
-
You presume correctly. I keep track of my dividend payments in my own spreadsheet (which has our salaries and the current tax thresholds) so I can see when I'm about to his the limit. I'm unlikely to hit a problem this year (having come from a relatively low/underpaid job) but next year will be different - but as above, so will my approach to moving money out of the business. -
Hmm, changing dividends does sound a bit naughty. I guess they figure that all the dividends can be set in stone at the end of the year when the company year end calculations are done and who's ever going to know? But what if you have a payment to multiple shareholders and then you start trying to retrospectively adjust the amount of the dividend? Arrrgh, it could get really messy.Originally posted by Maslins View Postmore concerningly, the splits stay "live", so there's been a couple of times where we've prepared a personal tax return based on the dividends, client then adds in some backdated expenses they "found", FreeAgent then recalculates the smart user payments altering the dividends. Not good...and clearly makes a mockery of things even if you were a good little boy and printed off your board minutes etc.
I like to keep my dividend, salary and expense payments separate. Your clients would need a pretty strong grip of accounting if they are going to mix them all up like that.Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
I guess in reality no-one ever sees the meeting minutes/ dividend vouchers and I guess you could do it all at the end of the year. But I prefer to do it properly at the time so at least I know where I am.Originally posted by Wanderer View PostHmm, changing dividends does sound a bit naughty. I guess they figure that all the dividends can be set in stone at the end of the year when the company year end calculations are done and who's ever going to know? But what if you have a payment to multiple shareholders and then you start trying to retrospectively adjust the amount of the dividend? Arrrgh, it could get really messy.
I like to keep my dividend, salary and expense payments separate. Your clients would need a pretty strong grip of accounting if they are going to mix them all up like that.
No brainer as well to keep the payments separate.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
This is the reason my accountant gave me as to why they do not support or recommend FreeAgent, basically the facility to declare illegal dividends.Originally posted by Maslins View PostThis...separate thread where FreeAgent's being praised...we love it to, but I have a real issue with the "smart user payment" facility, which basically means you take £X and it cleverly splits it for you between salary/expenses then the balance to dividends.
I don't like it for a few reasons:
1) as above, it doesn't really demonstrate that you knew what you were paying yourself and why
2) more concerningly, the splits stay "live", so there's been a couple of times where we've prepared a personal tax return based on the dividends, client then adds in some backdated expenses they "found", FreeAgent then recalculates the smart user payments altering the dividends. Not good...and clearly makes a mockery of things even if you were a good little boy and printed off your board minutes etc.
The fact that the FreeAgent system takes no account of whether the company can afford to pay a dividend is a potential time bomb."The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." CiceroComment
-
Wife is 50/50 shareholder. She only works part-time in her own job (about £15K). I pay myself £7K from limited.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't know what you guys do that allows you to build a warchest up from personal divi money that I can't. I spend most of what I pay myself with some savings, which are savings not warchest.
The warchest is most definitely the profit that I have left in the company after I have taken max divs which builds itself naturally...
I can't be building a 16-18k warchest when I only pay/divi myself around 40K a year :|
Are people kidding themselves that their savings are their warchest? To me they are totally separate. One is for big purchases for me and my family in the future, the other is to cover my income if I am on the bench.
There is always the situation that NWP2C is in where he has spent all but 2 months of his 'warchest' on his new house. That would indicate confusion over savings and warchest and also a problem that it can be spent far too easily on things it isn't supposed to be for.
This way we can take dividends of about £54K (£27K each) without hitting the 40% bracket. So I earn £34K, wife earns £42K
(Of course, if I massaged the share split to take account that wife earns £15K and I only earn £7K then we could both earn £42K but doing so is considered dodgy by HMRC).
Plenty for me. I don't take any more out because I don't want to pay 40% tax (not that theres a huge amount on my rate) so rest stays there like you or goes into pension.
Of course, this model doesn't work if you've got a partner who earns decent salary anyway.
To be honest, I think its wise to extract what you can from the company each tax year up to 40% limit. Don't see the point of keeping it in the company.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Bad idea to spend your warchest like this. My savings warchest is there just for that - its ringfenced not for use.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
There is always the situation that NWP2C is in where he has spent all but 2 months of his 'warchest' on his new house. That would indicate confusion over savings and warchest and also a problem that it can be spent far too easily on things it isn't supposed to be for.
If I want to buy anything I won't touch these savings. I need a new car at the moment but I ain't touching it I'd rather get a loan.
No good using your whole warchest to save a few £ on interest only to find yourself suddenly without contract. Nice car but zero money. I'd rather pay the interest to allow me the flexibilty of having my warchest easily accessible still (of course, you could flog the car).
One disadvantage of taking loan is that it increases outgoings and thus more is needed per month from warchest to pay the loan. But its a balancing act to keep outgoings down if possible and build warchest.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Me too. I measure my warchest as how long it will pay the bills for if I'm without contract. Currently up to about 15 months which is OK.Originally posted by ThomserveBAS View PostMaybe I see things a little more simply than you do then - my "warchest" is to cover an equivalent monthly salary should I be between contracts, where it sits is irrelevant to me. I set a goal of X number of months of good living and have piled all that into ISA's and the best savings accounts I can find whilst giving myself the flexibility to draw from them without having to give long notice periods.
My savings are elsewhere (in regular savings accounts and wherever else I can earn a couple of percentage points above the HSBC rate) - there is no connection between the two in my mind, maybe I'm a bit more disciplined than you give some people credit for?
I want my money to work for me - sat in the business account it does no such thing, so I spend the time (and actually enjoy) looking for the best (risk-free) way to make a bit of money on my hard-earned.
EDIT: And this isn't meant to be as scathing as it sounds, but just because someone does something in a different way to you doesn't make it wrong.
Time to start paying off more credit cards now. They're low rate balance transfer so no rush - see previous post about balancing act.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Or take what you need when you need it and stop fretting about extra taxes if you need the money for something (noting that usually I don't since I already have most of the necessary toys...)Originally posted by psychocandy View Post...snip... To be honest, I think its wise to extract what you can from the company each tax year up to 40% limit.
Unless like me you only aim to work 6/7 months a year but CBA to keep stopping and starting things...?Don't see the point of keeping it in the company.
At the end of the day there are no "right" business models, only the one that works for you. And at my age life's too short to worry about the last 5%Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
I am back up to 3 months warchestOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't know what you guys do that allows you to build a warchest up from personal divi money that I can't. I spend most of what I pay myself with some savings, which are savings not warchest.
The warchest is most definitely the profit that I have left in the company after I have taken max divs which builds itself naturally...
I can't be building a 16-18k warchest when I only pay/divi myself around 40K a year :|
Are people kidding themselves that their savings are their warchest? To me they are totally separate. One is for big purchases for me and my family in the future, the other is to cover my income if I am on the bench.
There is always the situation that NWP2C is in where he has spent all but 2 months of his 'warchest' on his new house. That would indicate confusion over savings and warchest and also a problem that it can be spent far too easily on things it isn't supposed to be for.
Hopefully will be up to 4 or 5 by the end of the contract!
Again thanks for keeping me in your thoughts.
Comment
-
No problems. Much easier to point out to people how badly they are doing something when you have a practical real life example at hand.Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostI am back up to 3 months warchest
Hopefully will be up to 4 or 5 by the end of the contract!
Again thanks for keeping me in your thoughts.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment