Originally posted by PhilBreeze
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
breeze
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
My mistake Sempra only went as far as the Special Commissioners but that's not bad as far as impartial legal authorities goOriginally posted by speling bee View PostLinky for House of Lords decisions please?
Anyway most of the facts were established in Dextra, Sempra merely confirmed them.
Dextra Accessories
House of Lords - MacDonald (Her Majesty's Inspector of Taxes (Respondent)) v Dextra Accessories Limited (Appellants)
Sempra Metals
http://www.financeandtaxtribunals.go...8/Spc00698.doc
The Sempra decision is a cracking read for anyone who wants a better idea of how the courts view such arrangements
Comment
-
Are you stark raving mad? It's truly a risk free proposition!Originally posted by captainhamWhilst I'm loving this thread and am intrigued to see how this pans out, in the words of a certain Mr Bannatyne: "Ah'm oot".The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Happy to be corrected but weren't both these cases dealing with EBT's and didn't the House of Lords dismiss the taxpayers appeal in the Dextra case in 2005Originally posted by PhilBreeze View PostMy mistake Sempra only went as far as the Special Commissioners but that's not bad as far as impartial legal authorities go
Anyway most of the facts were established in Dextra, Sempra merely confirmed them.
Dextra Accessories
House of Lords - MacDonald (Her Majesty's Inspector of Taxes (Respondent)) v Dextra Accessories Limited (Appellants)
Sempra Metals
http://www.financeandtaxtribunals.go...8/Spc00698.doc
The Sempra decision is a cracking read for anyone who wants a better idea of how the courts view such arrangements
Comment
-
Lisa, stop splitting hairs.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostHappy to be corrected but weren't both these cases dealing with EBT's and didn't the House of Lords dismiss the taxpayers appeal in the Dextra case in 2005The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
In both cases loans fron discretionary trusts were found not to be liable to income tax or NICs. The Dextra trust was an EBT and the Sempra trust was an EBT that converted to an FBT after the Dextra verdict. The House of Lords ruled against the taxpayer only on the deductibility of corporation tax on EBT contributions - non-EBT trust contribution remain deductible.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostHappy to be corrected but weren't both these cases dealing with EBT's and didn't the House of Lords dismiss the taxpayers appeal in the Dextra case in 2005Comment
-
-
So are you running an EBT?Originally posted by PhilBreeze View PostMe too
The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
-
No. That would be non-compliant with the complete mess that is ITEPA Part 7A.Originally posted by speling bee View PostSo are you running an EBT?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment