• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

breeze

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by PhilBreeze View Post
    No. That would be non-compliant with the complete mess that is ITEPA Part 7A.
    I am a simple contractor so apologies but Dextra was an EBT? If there model was different from yours, why quote the case?
    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

    George Frederic Watts

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by speling bee View Post
      I am a simple contractor so apologies but Dextra was an EBT? If there model was different from yours, why quote the case?
      : Had to pick you up on that owing to your sig!!!

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by captainham View Post
        : Had to pick you up on that owing to your sig!!!
        +1

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by captainham View Post
          : Had to pick you up on that owing to your sig!!!
          Oh the shame!
          The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

          George Frederic Watts

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

          Comment


            #65
            So Phil, if you are not operating an EBT, which as you say have been outlawed anyway, how is the case law relevant to the scheme that you are operating?
            Connect with me on LinkedIn

            Follow us on Twitter.

            ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

            Comment


              #66

              This article states that Mark Willis was Managing Director at Sunday Solutions

              Amazing what a google search can yield

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by MrJGrinder View Post
                This article states that Mark Willis was Managing Director at Sunday Solutions

                Amazing what a google search can yield
                Skynet = Google. They gave up sending terminators back in time to kill John Connor and instead just went back in time to submit a company name change instead. Much easier, and we're all still doomed.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                  I am a simple contractor so apologies but Dextra was an EBT? If there model was different from yours, why quote the case?
                  The Dextra trust was an EBT but the ruling that loan payments from trusts are not taxable applies to any discretionary trust.

                  EBTs are one of many types of discretionary trust.

                  I've quoted two cases one involving an EBT and the other mainly focusing on an FBT (family benefit trust). These acronyms are used for convenience and have no real legal meaning. In legal terms the type of both trusts is a discretionary trust - the FBT/EBT label refers to who the beneficiaries are.

                  In our case the trust is a discretionary trust too - but its not an EBT or FBT, in fact it doesnt have its own acronym as such..

                  The cases I have quoted have relevance as they demonstrate beyond doubt that certain types of payment from a discretionary trust are not subject to income tax or NICs, notwithstanding Part 7A ITEPA.

                  As I have pointed out in earlier posts this counts for much more than counsel opinion, and also prevents retrospection.

                  Clear as mud? Its getting technical..

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by PhilBreeze View Post
                    The Dextra trust was an EBT but the ruling that loan payments from trusts are not taxable applies to any discretionary trust.
                    In whose opinion?
                    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                    George Frederic Watts

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                      In whose opinion?
                      Dr Nuala Brice, OBE & Edward Sadler - Special Commissioners for HMRC:


                      "We conclude that when the Appellant made payments to the trusts, no transfer of cash or its equivalent was placed unreservedly at the disposal of the employees. That means that there was no payment by the Appellant of emoluments or earnings giving rise to an obligation to deduct income tax and pay it to the Revenue."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X