Originally posted by bobspud
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
First batch of HMRC IR35 compliance letters out
Collapse
X
-
I think i read that you have 1 month to reply, not sure if there is a fine/some other consequence.Contracting: more of the money, less of the sh1t -
I'm wondering how do they know who send this letter to?
I've never told them that I'm a contractorComment
-
Should be fairly easy to work out from self assessment and company returns. There would be certain key markers which would give a high indication that a company is a PSC.Originally posted by dimazigel View PostI'm wondering how do they know who send this letter to?
I've never told them that I'm a contractor
I think they boasted to the IR35 forum that the Services Company question on the P35 was largely redundant - that they have already identified the majority of PSC's.
Whether this is true or not - is another matterComment
-
What is the esteemed panel's view on all this?
The law has not changed. Is this just another scare tactic to persuade people to play it safe?Comment
-
You didn't think that through very well did youOriginally posted by dimazigel View PostI'm wondering how do they know who send this letter to?
I've never told them that I'm a contractor
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Pretty much IMO.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostWhat is the esteemed panel's view on all this?
The law has not changed. Is this just another scare tactic to persuade people to play it safe?
This isn't a change in the way investigations are carried out. The law still requires that to be done on a contract by contract basis. This is a change in the way they intend to select targets for investigation."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Who knows. No one gave exact answer to this question in this forum. Are there any spies here?Originally posted by northernladuk View PostYou didn't think that through very well did you
Looking at the documents company must submit, the only question related to filtering PSC from other companies is Question 6 in P35 form: Are you service company? I answered no. Let's see if I receive such letter. I think HMRC are very stupid and lazy. It is easier for them to catch you on a hook rather then check several million of small businesses.Comment
-
Most likely the consequence will be silence as the department buckles under the strain of trying to find all the companies that go to ground, ask for clarifications or generally refuse to play ball. I had an issue several years back where it took me over a year and a half to file a return. (bad accountant and was too busy/newbie to care) I was amazed how totally without a clue they were. I owed them a fair bit in the end but I could have sent the company into administration and walked away and they would have been none the wiser. You are all sat here thinking that HMRC knows everything about you, when in fact they are for the most part completely swamped and without a paddle.Originally posted by kingcook View PostI think i read that you have 1 month to reply, not sure if there is a fine/some other consequence.Comment
-
Ah but...Originally posted by dimazigel View PostWho knows. No one gave exact answer to this question in this forum. Are there any spies here?
Looking at the documents company must submit, the only question related to filtering PSC from other companies is Question 6 in P35 form: Are you service company? I answered no. Let's see if I receive such letter. I think HMRC are very stupid and lazy. It is easier for them to catch you on a hook rather then check several million of small businesses.
Firstly, do some reading onthe use of iXBRL on HMRC returns.
Then consider: if you answered no, but your various returns show your are the majority shareholder of a company with no employees, getting a small salary from that company plus dividends and having no other regular income, then they may just have a clue that you have not answered the P35 question correctly. Which is why you get the invitation to explain yourself...
That's why the advice is to answer Yes/No - that way you can defend your answer no matter what and you don't leave any hostages to fortune lying around.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Hmmm, not so sure unless you either commute daily or get a bloody good accommodation rate somewhere.Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostPeople need to realise unless you have an impressive Plan B that can generate substantial income, a contractor will generally still be better off IR35 caught.
In my current gig I wouldn't be any better off inside IR35 than taking a 40/45k pa permie role somewhere close to home.
If I do have to start working inside then I'd take something perm whilst really stepping up my plan B five nights a week.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment