Originally posted by meanttobeworking
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Ive just written to the contact on the guidance notes (Brian New, [email protected]). He has not replied following my questions around time to pay and bankruptcy on what is not a proven debt until litigation concludes:
Dear Me New following on from my email below I wanted to know whether you have been able to obtain any clarification or guidance in relation to my questions?
Having seen a press article by MP Mark Field today regarding tax avoidance by inegnious media, I also understand some scheme members are being offered a discount of upto 40% to settle early. I assume that is an offer open to any scheme user and not a privilege of a few schemes, or users. Please can you clarify the position.
regardsLast edited by smalldog; 9 July 2014, 08:47.Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostIve just written to the contact on the guidance notes (Brian New, [email protected]). He has not replied following my questions around time to pay and bankruptcy on what is not a proven debt until litigation concludes:
Dear Me New following on from my email below I wanted to know whether you have been able to obtain any clarification or guidance in relation to my questions?
Having seen a press article by MP Mark Field today regarding tax avoidance by inegnious media, I also understand some scheme members are being offered a discount of upto 40% to settle early. I assume that is an offer open to any scheme user and not a privilege of a few schemes, or users. Please can you clarify the position.
regards
I hope this backfires on them for conveniently releasing this to the media.Comment
-
Originally posted by lucozade View PostGood effort. I think we should all write to our MPs and Brian to ask the same question.
I hope this backfires on them for conveniently releasing this to the media.Comment
-
Originally posted by DotasScandal View PostTrue. The pressure needs to stay on...
Lin Honer may end up carrying the can for this, and she must be livid that Osborne and Gauke have dropped her in it. It'd be great to see a little Government inter-departmental war starting up.Comment
-
Originally posted by lucozade View PostThis is utterly outrageous to consider they are getting offered a discount!'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by lucozade View PostDear Mark Menzies,
Once again I thank you for your continued support.
I write to you regarding my daily concerns over S58(4) of Finance Bill
2008.
I would expect HMRCs treatment of all tax planning schemes to be fair
and to follow the same guidelines. However, I believe I am being
unfairly treated and being discriminated against.
Not only was I never warned between 2003 and 2008 that retrospection
would be used or that I was doing anything illegal but neither was I
ever offered a deal to settle early.
You may recall that HMRC offered a deal to Suo Moto users whom had been
involved in the same tax planning as the scheme I used. HMRC refused to
offer this deal to me.
Today I read in the national press that users of the Liberty tax
strategy are being offered a 40% reduction to settle early.
The Government and HMRC have maintained that the scheme I used was
"aggresive" and "wholly exceptional". The same words used to describe
the Liberty tax strategy - yet I'm not being offered a 40% reduction!
This is an outrageous injustice to those terrified of bankruptcy due to
the retrospective nature of s58(4).
I would therefore appreciate if you could write to the minister
concerned asking why our tax planning scheme is not being offered a
similar discount if we settle early. This could mean the difference
between bankruptcy and not and could avoid numerous lengthy court
battles.
Yours sincerely,
I've used the above (with the typos fixed plus added reference to Ingenious Media) to send an email to my MP Zac Goldsmith - he was sympathetic to our plight in the past so hopefully, he'll take up the baton again...Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostIt might be a good time to assemble a list of those in power who voted in the select committee to breach article 39 of the Magna Carta, and it should include those that voted in S58, which after all seeks to breach our right to be judged "according to the law of the land".
Lin Honer may end up carrying the can for this, and she must be livid that Osborne and Gauke have dropped her in it. It'd be great to see a little Government inter-departmental war starting up.
Definitely need to keep a tab on them the same way they keep tabs on us.Comment
-
Originally posted by BettySwollocks View PostNicely put...
I've used the above (with the typos fixed plus added reference to Ingenious Media) to send an email to my MP Zac Goldsmith - he was sympathetic to our plight in the past so hopefully, he'll take up the baton again...Comment
-
Originally posted by lucozade View Postlol "with the typos fixed". I was typing in a rageComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment