Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Letter sent
Just sent off my Letter.
I still do not understand why HMRC did not take people to a Tax Tribunal many many years ago. I can only conclude that they were not sure of winning but by changing the rules now believe they are in a much better position.Comment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostThat's a terrible argument. It's not "fair" for a wife to find out her husband has been having an affair, or downloading illegal child porn, but life isn't fair and things don't work that way.
Your wife and daughter aren't responsible for whatever money HMRC decide you owe them. Perhaps you should make sure everything is in their names...
Using your argument maybe we should tell the government "life isnt fair and things dont work that way Mr Gauke so just suck it up"
MY entire argument on fairness is based around the passage of time and retro action, it took them 8 years to implement the retro action, that is NOT fair in most peoples book.
Im sure there would be many people shouting "fairness" from the rooftops is PSC's had retro action going back some 8 years to change the landscape so more people got caught by IR35. And Im not the kind of individual to snigger in the corner saying "you got what you deserved" if that did ever happen I would be sympathetic.
PS - the parallel between child porn and adultery is a terrible argument, this is a government agency we are dealing with here, not some seedy sex antics.Last edited by smalldog; 17 February 2014, 15:04.Comment
-
Sent my consultation letter
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostNTRT have prepared a template letter for people to respond to the consultation. Please alter it in your own words.
Latest News | No To Retrospective Taxation
Some people will say it won't count if everyone sends similar letters but HMRC will have to report to the Minister how many responses they got. So every letter does count.Comment
-
Originally posted by jlg15333 View PostHope some of this counts or something as after writing countless letters to my MP and visiting him in his office nothing seems to be going our way ..
I don't think HMRC will be very happy that NTRT and Whitehouse have become involved.Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostHMRC and trustees in bankruptcy are wise to that.Comment
-
My thoughts entirely - they can't take what I haven't got and at least I'll be able to look back at fun times from my bus shelter
Sent from my GT-I9100 using TapatalkJoin Big Group - don't let them get away with it
http://www.wttbiggroup.co.uk/Comment
-
growlergrowler
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
I'm guessing HMRC couldn't come after a casino for cash if you blew it all prior to collection, or go and demand Porsche refund a car at full price because you bought one a few months in advance,. So, what if you lost all your money in a series of transactions? Those could include a bit of gambling, maybe some bets with people (mates, wife, etc.) Perhaps you then blew the rest of the money, perhaps the products / services you purchased were offered by a company. Perhaps your wife owns that company by total coincidence, unbeknown to you!?
I would not for one moment advocate anything that would deny HMRC their "fair share", I do think they should get their fair share of whatever you have left, even if that is sweet, sweet FA
I think Invisible Touch was the group's undisputed masterpieceComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Today 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Comment