No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008

[BrilloPad]

No, we just need the David Gauke with principles who was abducted by aliens to be returned.

He is hiding inside. A good slapping will bring it out.

I fondly remember f4j's encouter with the head of the SFLA association. He had conceded that family law was biased privately. But refused to go public. He changed his mind overnight.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

[moira under the stairs]

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

Makes your blood boil doesn't it

Look out the window blue sky's with fluffy white clouds.

[Ninja]

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

I think their strategy is to make out that we're making a fuss over nothing, because it's their only defence. They can't defeat us over the main arguement & inequity because they would surely be defeated.
Me thinks that we're beginning to get under his skin......good!

[Disgusted of Coventry]

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

Could Gauke have maybe deliberately passed this back down the food-chain to the originators of s58? Saying something like "This is your mess. You created it. You dig yourselves out."?

At any rate, someone appears to be frantically rewriting the script every few weeks.

[Emigre]

Could Gauke have maybe deliberately passed this back down the food-chain to the originators of s58? Saying something like "This is your mess. You created it. You dig yourselves out."?

At any rate, someone appears to be frantically rewriting the script every few weeks.

They have misjudged us. They assumed that we would go away. That was a mistake. We are not going anywhere until this injustice has been properly resolved.

As DR says, their numbers are inconsistent with their own numbers. Gauke's position would start to look untenable if all the facts were made public. Personally, I couldn't vote for anyone capable of discarding his principles the way Gauke has.

[WelshRarebit]

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

It makes you wonder why they are afraid of the real facts?

[BarneyCool]

Does that not make him accountable?

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

if he signs this pile of tulip then surely he must be held accountable to any inaccuracies and blatant porkies that come to light when we finally blow the lid off this!

[Disgusted of Coventry]

They have misjudged us. They assumed that we would go away. That was a mistake. We are not going anywhere until this injustice has been properly resolved.

As DR says, their numbers are inconsistent with their own numbers. Gauke's position would start to look untenable if all the facts were made public. Personally, I couldn't vote for anyone capable of discarding his principles the way Gauke has.

I envisage a small child emerging from the crowd to shout: "Hey look! The Minister isn't wearing any clothes!"

[nick4notax]

we all know there's no financial point in HMRCs pursuits

Everything Gauke is saying is coming from HMRC. He is just the mouthpiece and signatory to the letters.

• The 1900 users (previously 3000 according to Timms)
• The £230M at stake
• The claim that more than one-third of Trusts were never used (utter bollocks)
• All the claptrap and weasel words

HMRC are using the Minister to mislead Parliament (again).

Isn't it ridiculous: I'm pretty sure the amount HMRC would be seeking to recover from me would be eclipsed easily by their costs of recovery (yes, I would do the opposite of die quietly) before bankruptcy prevented them taking blood too. It's surely the same for many, many victims of this S58 Branni-scam. I'm equally sure that this reality means sweet f*** all to those lying little turds in HMRC though...