Originally posted by helen7
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by helen7 View PostFolks its time to throw in the towel. We lost. Get over it. It would have been a lot better for most of us if HMRC could have demanded up front payment after the first judicial review. That would have seemed fair to me.
This is the opinion of the FTT and HMRC are likely to take
I understand that some people have been through awful situations (divorce, credit crunch) but for the majority - you have had 6 years to save up for this moment.
You have to ask yourself; what have you been spending your money on for the last 6 years if you haven't saved up.
Don't expect much sympathy folks. Even my own mother said 'serves you right'.
To be honest win or not, I dont want a judicial review ground hog day all over again. I would rather pay upfront and start in some way to move on. I dont want to be sitting here in another 10 years time staring down the barrel of a massively increased liability with less ability to pay! The positives for me being the interest clock stops ticking, and you never know it may end with the upfront payment so we could actually be better off. How long would it really take to conclude the legal process with such a backlog and we then have to pay the interest portion, maybe never and HMRC may be less inclined to pursue for the interest if they have the disputed amounts on account. Dont shoot me, im trying to find some positive in all this!Last edited by smalldog; 20 March 2014, 12:17.Comment
-
As things stand
I admit that things appear to have taken a turn for the worse, and believe people must now hope for the best but prepare for the worst. We do however still have a few bullets left;
1) Montpelier's ECHR submission.
2) Appeal to the Adjudicator/Ombudsman re HMRC malpractice
3) Contesting the Bill itself.
Unfortunately time is not on our side with the first two - does anyone from Notoretro have a update on these appeals? Regarding the last, there will indeed be many more than us affected, and given the wealth and connections of some of these people combined with effective lobbying, I would say we still have a chance of escaping this vindictive and uncompassionate legislation.Comment
-
HMRC can raid your bank account
Did you spot this? Budget gives HMRC power to raid your bank accountComment
-
-
My whole liability is over 100k, but with the DOTAS budget announcement rumoured to from 2004 and no penalties etc, subject to finding my last brown envelope I believe my liability is circa 30k...a loan from Barclays may just do it. The real issue for me comes when/if Hmrc come knocking for the other money. Then I am screwed, bankruptcy looms....but when.Last edited by warlord; 20 March 2014, 12:45.Comment
-
Hi all, apologies for not replying yesterday, like yourselves we were focused on the budget.
In answer to the questions raised, this is a production for Channel 4 and is bound by strict Ofcom regulations that ensure impartiality. Our intention is to represent a variety of opinions on important tax matters such as this.
To clarify, this is not paid for by HMRC and as an independent production company, we are interested in hearing your side of the story. As mentioned before, all information is off the record at this stage and doesn’t oblige you to take part.Comment
-
Originally posted by RNewton View Postensure impartiality.
And the editorial slant won't be that we're all a bunch of money grabbing tax dodgers? Forgive me if I don't look convinced.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fireship View PostComment
-
Originally posted by RNewton View PostHi all, apologies for not replying yesterday, like yourselves we were focused on the budget.
In answer to the questions raised, this is a production for Channel 4 and is bound by strict Ofcom regulations that ensure impartiality. Our intention is to represent a variety of opinions on important tax matters such as this.
To clarify, this is not paid for by HMRC and as an independent production company, we are interested in hearing your side of the story. As mentioned before, all information is off the record at this stage and doesn’t oblige you to take part.
I don't speak for everyone of course, but may I politely encourage you to read through the past posts on this forum. You will quickly appreciate the heartbreak and devastation being visited upon us by HMRC malpractice and lies. We are just normal little folk (mostly software developers and the like) who sought a better way to trade independently when Gordon Brown introduced the uncertainty of IR35 to the otherwise ordinary world of limited companies. We are not employees, disguised or otherwise, we're just normal traders selling our services. Of course, efficient tax planning was of appeal, but equally, so was being free of the totally uncertainty of trading with the fear of IR35 rendering otherwise profitable undertakings to become insolvent by twist of an overnight taxman's knife.
So, may I please ask you to help ensure the context is fully covered as we are being totally ruined by HMRC. After all, who would fully disclose everything, have the return accepted then expect the government to introduce a law change and BACKDATE its applicability? Never cease to be shocked to the core about this, personally.
ThanksLord Clyde in 1929: ‘No man is under the smallest obligation, moral or other, so to arrange his legal relations to his business or to his property as to enable the Revenue to put the largest possible shovel into his stores. The Revenue is not slow to take every advantage which is open to it under the taxing statutes for the purpose of depleting the taxpayer’s pocket. And the taxpayer is entitled to be astute to prevent, so far as he honestly can, the depletion of his means by the Revenue.’Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Today 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Yesterday 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
- Finish the song lyric Dec 12 12:05
- A quick read of the taxman’s Spotlight 67 may not be enough Dec 12 09:27
- Contractor MVL Solution from SFP Dec 11 12:53
- Gary Lineker and HMRC broker IR35 settlement on the hush Dec 11 09:10
- IT contractor jobs market sinks to four-year low in November Dec 10 09:30
- Joke of the Day Dec 9 14:57
Comment