Quick question - does provided accommodation abroad for short contract (1 month) would have IR35 implications?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Provided Accommodation IR35 implications
Collapse
X
-
-
No. Why would it?Originally posted by AndrewK View PostQuick question - does provided accommodation abroad for short contract (1 month) would have IR35 implications?Blog? What blog...?
-
IR35 depends on your working conditions, specifically in regard to Control, Substitution and lack of Mutuality of Obligation. Other factors have proved to be important in recent Court decisions too, such as being part & parcel of the firm and 'acting' like a business.
If you're on dodgy ground with the main factors then having accommodation paid for won't help. If your contracts (which match your actual working conditions) are strong and there's a good reason why they are paying then it shouldn't be a major issue.Comment
-
Because of a complete misundstanding of IR35?Originally posted by malvolio View PostNo. Why would it?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Comment
-
I refer the learned gentleman to NLUK's previous answer.Originally posted by AndrewK View PostOk maybe I misunderstand IR35, but wouldn't that be seen as benefit of kind.
Perhaps you should have a read of the PCG Guide to Freelancing. If you don't understand the basics of IR35, what else don't you know you don't know?
But to answer the immediate question, it may be a BIK (although I seriously doubt it, it's no different to you charging your client for the same necessary-for-business accomodation) but even if it were, it would have no relevance to IR35 at all.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
If you're not an employee then there can be no Benefit in Kind.Originally posted by AndrewK View PostOk maybe I misunderstand IR35, but wouldn't that be seen as benefit of kind.
In the interests of acting like a business, you could pay for the accommodation yourself and bill the client for it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Yesterday 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment