Quick question - does provided accommodation abroad for short contract (1 month) would have IR35 implications?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Provided Accommodation IR35 implications
Collapse
X
-
-
No. Why would it?Originally posted by AndrewK View PostQuick question - does provided accommodation abroad for short contract (1 month) would have IR35 implications?Blog? What blog...?
-
IR35 depends on your working conditions, specifically in regard to Control, Substitution and lack of Mutuality of Obligation. Other factors have proved to be important in recent Court decisions too, such as being part & parcel of the firm and 'acting' like a business.
If you're on dodgy ground with the main factors then having accommodation paid for won't help. If your contracts (which match your actual working conditions) are strong and there's a good reason why they are paying then it shouldn't be a major issue.Comment
-
Because of a complete misundstanding of IR35?Originally posted by malvolio View PostNo. Why would it?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Comment
-
I refer the learned gentleman to NLUK's previous answer.Originally posted by AndrewK View PostOk maybe I misunderstand IR35, but wouldn't that be seen as benefit of kind.
Perhaps you should have a read of the PCG Guide to Freelancing. If you don't understand the basics of IR35, what else don't you know you don't know?
But to answer the immediate question, it may be a BIK (although I seriously doubt it, it's no different to you charging your client for the same necessary-for-business accomodation) but even if it were, it would have no relevance to IR35 at all.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
If you're not an employee then there can be no Benefit in Kind.Originally posted by AndrewK View PostOk maybe I misunderstand IR35, but wouldn't that be seen as benefit of kind.
In the interests of acting like a business, you could pay for the accommodation yourself and bill the client for it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Yesterday 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Comment