In a B2B relationship between supplier and client, is there a rule of thumb which party should provide the contract? I know often if one party is much larger they can force the issue but is there a "right way" when that's not the case?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Any particular rule on who should provide the contract?
Collapse
X
-
Any particular rule on who should provide the contract?
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
There's no hard rule but in my experience it's usually the supplier in most B2B situations. This is probably because the supplier's contracts tend to be drafted towards the specific service/transaction involved while the client's are usually far more generic.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIn a B2B relationship between supplier and client, is there a rule of thumb which party should provide the contract? I know often if one party is much larger they can force the issue but is there a "right way" when that's not the case? -
Most suppliers will have a set of standard terms and conditions. Many clients will also have a set of standard terms that they contract under. Start with one set (I'd see what the supplier's terms are first) and then negotiate anything that you want changing.Comment
-
I've had two direct contracts and in both cases the customer refused to use my contract, preferring instead to use their own despite signs of not understanding contracting and with their contract being inferior with respect to ir35 etc. In both cases it was HR that was drafting the contract. In one it took them over a week when I'd taken two hours.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment