- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Any particular rule on who should provide the contract?"
Collapse
-
I've had two direct contracts and in both cases the customer refused to use my contract, preferring instead to use their own despite signs of not understanding contracting and with their contract being inferior with respect to ir35 etc. In both cases it was HR that was drafting the contract. In one it took them over a week when I'd taken two hours.
-
Most suppliers will have a set of standard terms and conditions. Many clients will also have a set of standard terms that they contract under. Start with one set (I'd see what the supplier's terms are first) and then negotiate anything that you want changing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostIn a B2B relationship between supplier and client, is there a rule of thumb which party should provide the contract? I know often if one party is much larger they can force the issue but is there a "right way" when that's not the case?
Leave a comment:
-
Any particular rule on who should provide the contract?
In a B2B relationship between supplier and client, is there a rule of thumb which party should provide the contract? I know often if one party is much larger they can force the issue but is there a "right way" when that's not the case?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: